This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Seryo93 (talk | contribs) at 14:35, 21 November 2021 (→Requested move 16 November 2021). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:35, 21 November 2021 by Seryo93 (talk | contribs) (→Requested move 16 November 2021)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Revolution of Dignity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
News items involving this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "In the news" column on February 19, 2014, and February 23, 2014. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Questions about Soros and OSF Role
I have noticed that the articles about the different revolutions in Ukraine don't mention the fundamental role of George Soros, which he himself highlighted in several news sources, e.g., https://www.ft.com/content/695226e0-e528-11e7-97e2-916d4fbac0da Wouldn't it make sense including a historically acknowledged fact? Thank you.
Appreciation to the Authors
I just wanted to thank you for the accurate page, despite the overwhelming propaganda. During the revolution I lived in Podil, at the bottom of the hill below the center, on Sagaydachnogo below where the stacks of tires were used to blocked the road, and near the Funicular. All I saw were good people, from every walk of life, desperate for a better life, seeking to end a corrupt government. Slava Ukrayini. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:188:4100:1304:45D:DE32:F6BE:6643 (talk) 21:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Why not wait to vote in a new government rather than support a violent coup? Prunesqualor billets_doux 09:05, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Link to Paul Manafort?
I'm not a wikipedia talker, so I hope I'm doing this right.. Wanted to point out that publicly released text records between Paul Manafort's daughters state that this "revolution" was orchestrated by Paul Manafort and that he was paid for it. Here's the part in question, which can be found in any of the copies of the texts available online:
Sent: I have LOADS of evidence that a COURT OF LAW would accept.
Received: He prob feels he has s right
Received: And yet somehow my own mother, Disney.
Sent: Doesn't
Received: Yes well just bc he feels something doesn't make it so
Sent: He also felt he had a right to sexually assault mom
Sent: He has no moral or legal compass
Received 2015-03-31: You know he has killed people in Ukraine? Knowingly
Sent: What?!
Sent: No
Sent: Yup
Sent: Remember when there were all those deaths taking place? A while back. About a year ago
Sent: Revolts and what not
Sent: Do you know whose strategy that was to cause that
Received: To send those people out and get them slaughtered.
Received: As a tactic to outrage the world and get focus on Ukraine.
Sent: Don't fool yourself. That money we have is blood money
Sent: I don't advise raising it with him. He lies like a rug and gets realllll pissed off. But it's true. He thinks I don't remember
Thought I'd mention it, though I'm not 100% sure on the details (figured I'd leave that to professional fact-finders rather than try myself).
Thanks for all the work you folks do! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.106.22.8 (talk) 23:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestion! This is interesting to read, but unfortunately this material is not usable on Misplaced Pages... Both because it is a Primary source, and because the discussion between Paul Manford’s daughters is hearsay since they were not themselves involved in the events. This could be included if the messages were reported on and put in a context by reliable secondary sources. Heptor (talk) 00:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Revolution?
The title is misleading. The events in Ukraine just don't measure up as a 'revolution'. Pre- and post- the coup-d'etat didn't change much. It retained the same federal structure. It continued to hold elections generally considered to pass the requirements of being free and fair. It is still a president/PM representative democracy. It's still a market. economy. So I am seeking a consensus on what the title should be changed to. I think the most accurate would be "Ukraine 2014 Coup-d'Etat". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.89.175.29 (talk) 04:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- That is an exceedingly narrow definition or 'revolution' and one not shared by WP:RELIABLE sources on the topic. blindlynx (talk) 20:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
I agree with 174.89.175.29. The title should be changed.Seekallknowledge (talk) 14:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Title change
I'm very hesitant to get into this mess again, but isn't it obviously partisan to append the qualifier "of dignity" to this Ukrainian revolution? Removing "Ukrainian" from the title also makes the title less recognizable. Re the title change on Nov 5th. Seems like an activist move to me. Heptor (talk) 12:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- We follow reliable sources. The COMMONNAME has clearly become 'Revolution of Dignity' in reliable sources, and there is nothing wrong with using a common name that is 'partisan' (see WP:POVTITLE), even though I don't agree that this title is such. 'Revolution of Dignity' returns 258,000 Google search hits, the old title merely 17,000. Notable published examples include: Ukraine's Maidan, Russia's War: A Chronicle and Analysis of the Revolution of Dignity, this report from the Brookings Institution, and this report from OpenDemocracy. There is nothing less identifiable about this title...in fact, it is much more identifiable, and much more in line with how reliable sources treat this subject! RGloucester — ☎ 16:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- According to the policy, we prefer titles that are recognizable, natural and precise. The title "2014 Ukrainian revolution" is all of these. There is also "Euromaidan Revolution", which is neutral and precise, but perhaps somewhat less recognizable to the general audience. Looking up the hits on "Revolution of Dignity", the top of the list is an article titled "Ukraine's revolution of dignity: The dynamics of Euromaidan". It says that "This paper analyzes the civil revolution in Ukraine, which is also known as the Euromaidan Revolution. It is regarded as the Revolution of Dignity by Ukrainian citizens. I also get matches on the Ukrainian Institute and the Maidan Museum. Looking up "euromaidan+revolution" Eurmaidan Revolution I get results on The Jackson School of International Studies (Ukraine’s Euromaidan Revolution), "Considering the Orange legacy: patterns of political participation in the Euromaidan Revolution". To me it looks like the use of the word "dignity" is often an attempt to describe it rather than to name it. So "Euromaidan Revolution" looks like a better title than the one proposed, however I don't see any good reasons to change the title that the article had since the beginning. Heptor (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- The present title is recognisable, natural and, precise. That determination is based on what reliable sources uses, and given that they have no trouble using 'Revolution of Dignity', neither does Misplaced Pages. I agree that Euromaidan Revolution is an acceptable title, and commonly used. However, a search suggests that Revolution of Dignity is much more common in reliable sources. I think your claim that this title is a 'description' is off the mark. Examples like this article, which is actually not about the revolution itself, show that Revolution of Dignity is used as a proper name, without additional qualifiers, to refer to these events in reliable sources. Even the Financial Times, a source much more likely to be read by non-academics, does not hesitate to include 'Revolution of Dignity' without additional qualifiers (in this case in an article written by President Zelensky). I find it hard to believe that we should deviate from what most sources use in this case. RGloucester — ☎ 16:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- According to the policy, we prefer titles that are recognizable, natural and precise. The title "2014 Ukrainian revolution" is all of these. There is also "Euromaidan Revolution", which is neutral and precise, but perhaps somewhat less recognizable to the general audience. Looking up the hits on "Revolution of Dignity", the top of the list is an article titled "Ukraine's revolution of dignity: The dynamics of Euromaidan". It says that "This paper analyzes the civil revolution in Ukraine, which is also known as the Euromaidan Revolution. It is regarded as the Revolution of Dignity by Ukrainian citizens. I also get matches on the Ukrainian Institute and the Maidan Museum. Looking up "euromaidan+revolution" Eurmaidan Revolution I get results on The Jackson School of International Studies (Ukraine’s Euromaidan Revolution), "Considering the Orange legacy: patterns of political participation in the Euromaidan Revolution". To me it looks like the use of the word "dignity" is often an attempt to describe it rather than to name it. So "Euromaidan Revolution" looks like a better title than the one proposed, however I don't see any good reasons to change the title that the article had since the beginning. Heptor (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- We follow reliable sources. The COMMONNAME has clearly become 'Revolution of Dignity' in reliable sources, and there is nothing wrong with using a common name that is 'partisan' (see WP:POVTITLE), even though I don't agree that this title is such. 'Revolution of Dignity' returns 258,000 Google search hits, the old title merely 17,000. Notable published examples include: Ukraine's Maidan, Russia's War: A Chronicle and Analysis of the Revolution of Dignity, this report from the Brookings Institution, and this report from OpenDemocracy. There is nothing less identifiable about this title...in fact, it is much more identifiable, and much more in line with how reliable sources treat this subject! RGloucester — ☎ 16:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
But here arrives another question: doesn't the new term encompass entire Euromaidan (November 2013 - February 2014)? Bests, --Seryo93 (talk) 10:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Responses sections
I would suggest to remove this section. It is outdated and frankly reads ridiculous. One could say "WP is not news", but those are very old and outdated "news". My very best wishes (talk) 23:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Domestic/international reactions moved here from main page.My very best wishes (talk) 16:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Domestic responsesVerkhovna RadaOn 20 February, Parliament resumed its work around 16:00 and worked until about 23:00. Members adopted a draft law that expressed "condemnation of the violence that led to the deaths of peaceful citizens of Ukraine". On the morning of 21 February, Parliament announced that Speaker Rybak had signed a resolution titled "About condemning violence in Ukraine, which led to loss of life". The resolution ordered the Cabinet of Ukraine and all siloviks to stop the use of force and prohibited the use of any weapons and special measures against citizens of Ukraine. Political response
Regions
International reactionsInternational organisations
Nations
|
Requested move 25 June 2021
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Closed as malformed. RGloucester — ☎ 13:08, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
2014 Ukrainian revolution → Revolution of Dignity – Revert undiscussed move from the stable title unfortunately carried out using the page mover tool, making a standard BRD revert impossible. RGloucester — ☎ 04:50, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Polyamorph (talk) 08:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comments moved from RM/Technical requests:
- This move should not be performed without discussion. The move to "Revolution of Dignity" was previously performed as an undiscussed move by RGloucester, and was challenged on the article talk page shortly after it was made. Their favored title is not the stable one. See discussion on my user talk page. (t · c) buidhe 05:04, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Not done per Buidhe's comment above. This needs proper discussion. Kindly start a discussion to achieve a stable name. —usernamekiran (talk) 07:50, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- This is incorrect. The undiscussed move from the stable title was made by Buidhe, and any RM should take place from the stable title to the proposed title, not the other way around. I am closing this RM and will request a new technical request. User Buidhe is unfortunately intent on causing trouble, and I am sure adequate punishment will eventually be imposed. RGloucester — ☎ 13:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Change the section "Russian involvement" to "Foreign involvement"?
Hello. We have a section dedicated to Russian involvement in the revolution, but I don't see anything about the speech given by John McCain to the Euromaidan protestors , or anything about the leaked phone call between Victoria Nuland and the US ambassador to Ukraine . So I wonder if that section should be made more general, and other external influences included in it. 67.70.119.213 (talk) 20:34, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
References
- https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/15/john-mccain-ukraine-protests-support-just-cause
- https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957
Article name
For some reason, until I moved the page today (30 October 2021), this article was named "2013–14 Ukrainian revolution" but the Euromaidan protest were only protest from November 2013 until February 2014 and something completly different then the events described in this Misplaced Pages article. The Euromaidan protest did take place in 2013 and 2014 but this article discribes only the series of events in Kyiv in February 2014 culminating in the ousting of then-president Viktor Yanukovych (the rest of the Euromaidan events is described in it's own English language Misplaced Pages article). So this particular article can not have in it's name "2013". I have moved the article to "February 2014 Maidan revolution since this seems to be the events WP:COMMONNAME per Ukraine`s timeline of BBC news — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 11:53, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- What's with the constant name changes again, especially without discussion? I can see your argument for removing the 2013 part, but why change the rest of the name? It should be 2014 Ukrainian revolution like it was before; February is unnecessary since there wasn't any other revolution in Ukraine in 2014 (or a "Maidan" revolution anywhere in the world for that matter), and removing the country's name just makes it less descriptive. Plenty of sources call it by different names, BBC isn't the only one out there. It's been called Euromaidan, Maidan, Revolution of Dignity, just the 2014 revolution, and many others. Why choose one when it's not clearly the dominant one used in all major English-speaking media, and there is a more neutral and descriptive one available? Mordrim (talk) 08:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
As long as Euromaidan and the February 2014 events in Kyiv (culminating in the ousting of then-president Viktor Yanukovych) are not being made to look the same thing I am OK with "2014 Ukrainian revolution". Actually I tried to move the page to 2014 Ukrainian revolution (last 30 October) but could not because it required a page move request I considered a waste of my time.... I did spend a lot of time on October 30 to improve the article... though 😁😏😉 Anyway there is now on ongoing page move below Mordrim. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 16 November 2021
The request to rename this article to Revolution of Dignity has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
February 2014 Maidan revolution → Revolution of Dignity – Per WP:COMMONNAME. 'Revolution of Dignity' has become the common name for this revolution , used in many reliable sources and publications on the subject. A plain Google search shows that 'Revolution of Dignity' comes up with 60,900,000 hits, vastly exceeding the current title's 181,000. Notable publications using the now common name: . The other titles simply does not reflect the reality on the ground, or indeed, the naming used by reliable sources. While it has taken time for RS to get to this point, we can say that it is now time to follow the sources and rename this article. Somerby (talk) 15:06, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- @RGloucester, Ymblanter, and Yulia Romero: sorry if I forgot someone to ping. --Somerby (talk) 15:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment While 'Revolution of Dignity' is no doubt the WP:OFFICIALNAME the common name is still 'euromaidan' 12,500 hits on google scholar or 'maidan revolution' 13,900 hits . Note 'maidan Ukraine' gets 15,800 hits but some are about the orange revolution —blindlynx (talk) 16:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Blindlynx, I agree with you that the common name is 'Euromaidan', but Euromaidan is different than the Revolution of Dignity. The reliable English-language sources make a distinction between the broader Euromaidan movement and the Revolution of Dignity. --Somerby (talk) 16:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Yes I agree with Somerby that the 2013/2014 Euromaidan and the (only in) February 2014 events in Kyiv (culminating in the ousting of then-president Viktor Yanukovych) should not look the same thing. Although I am personally very sympathetic to naming the article 'Revolution of Dignity' it is not a name recognizable for most people in the English speaking world. From my own search on 30 October I concluded that most English press name it a 'revolution'. So I prefer an article name with 'revolution' in it. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- sorry, I miss your argument. 'Revolution of Dignity' is an article name with 'revolution' in it, isn't it? Another option can be 'Maidan revolution', but here confusion with Orange revolution can arise. I do not like year in the name, because at least in part of the RS the broader 2013/2014 scope is used (also for the revolution, not only for the Euromaidan movement). --Somerby (talk) 18:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Mainstream English press do/did not use the word 'Dignity' when reporting about the revolution. Many revolutions can be considered to be a 'Revolution of Dignity' (in Sudan or Belarus). Only people who are already very informed about Ukraine will recognise the February 2014 events in Kyiv as the 'Revolution of Dignity'. I am only following the logic/guidelines of Misplaced Pages:Article titles here. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Press are not the only RS which we should take into account (and I do not agree that mainstream English press do not use the word 'Dignity' when reporting about the revolution by the way). Google Scholar search also should be take into account. --Somerby (talk) 18:50, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Mainstream English press is where most people get there information from. As for as I know scholarly papers are not read by many people.... So I do not take them in account when looking for a WP:COMMONNAME. That is my way for establising a common name. Anyway, consensus should establish an article name, not me. I would not vote for renaming the article 'Revolution of Dignity'. If consensus would make 'Revolution of Dignity' the article name it is OK by me. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 19:03, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Press are not the only RS which we should take into account (and I do not agree that mainstream English press do not use the word 'Dignity' when reporting about the revolution by the way). Google Scholar search also should be take into account. --Somerby (talk) 18:50, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Mainstream English press do/did not use the word 'Dignity' when reporting about the revolution. Many revolutions can be considered to be a 'Revolution of Dignity' (in Sudan or Belarus). Only people who are already very informed about Ukraine will recognise the February 2014 events in Kyiv as the 'Revolution of Dignity'. I am only following the logic/guidelines of Misplaced Pages:Article titles here. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom--RicardoNixon97 (talk) 07:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support On second thought, even though it's not the common name in english it's a good natural dab—blindlynx (talk) 15:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Remember that COMMONNAME means “in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources,” not restricted to news, or to wherever you or I intuit that “most people get their information.” News, books, and scholarly sources all contribute to the acceptance of a name, influencing different segments and on different time scales. And remember that COMMONNAME is a shortcut for the five WP:CRITERIA of article titling, and when it’s not clear, we should look at them individually. “February 2014 Maidan revolution” is a description with natural disambiguation: its qualifying date may be superfluous in some contexts, so naturalness suffers; it is similar to the separate article Euromaidan and the redirect Maidan Crisis → Orange Revolution so precision suffers; it is longer so concision suffers. “Revolution of Dignity” is unambiguous, satisfies all five criteria, most of them better. Although other articles are at Revolution of Dignity (disambiguation), this is the exact full title. Anyway, here’s a comparison of some searches:
- Google Advanced Book Search (per WP:SET, restricted to English-language sources)
- "Revolution of Dignity" Ukraine -Misplaced Pages: about 3,120 results (+46% over next)
- "Maidan revolution" Ukraine -Misplaced Pages: about 2,140 results
- "February 2014 Maidan revolution" -Misplaced Pages: 13 results
- Google Scholar Search (returned errors when going past page 98)
- "Revolution of Dignity" Ukraine -Misplaced Pages: about 4,110 results (+194%)
- "Maidan revolution" Ukraine -Misplaced Pages: about 1,400 results
- "February 2014 Maidan revolution" -Misplaced Pages: 7 results
- Google News (I wonder if this search limits to 100?)
- "Revolution of Dignity" Ukraine -Misplaced Pages: I counted 101 results
- "Maidan revolution" Ukraine -Misplaced Pages: 100
- "February 2014 Maidan revolution" -Misplaced Pages: no result found
- Google Advanced Book Search (per WP:SET, restricted to English-language sources)
- —Michael Z. 18:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- One has to keep in mind, that proposed term apparently encompasses entire Euromaidan (2013-2014), not just February 2014 phase. Taking that into account, I'm leaning towards opposing move. Bests, --Seryo93 (talk) 12:07, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support – Largely per Mzajac's analysis. The proposed title is the clear common name, and indeed, the article used to be at that title until someone moved it out of process. In the first place, I strongly disagree with the scope of this article being limited to February 2014, and this is a recent change. When dealt with in scholarly sources, this event is treated as encompassing the whole stretch of events from 2013 until the actual removal of Yanukovych. This is distinct from 'Euromaidan', which is specifically the protest movement, rather than the series of events that movement brought about. There is no reason why our coverage of these events should deviate from that of reliable sources. Let's align it with RS, and move this article as proposed. RGloucester — ☎ 13:46, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- If the scope is to be expanded to cover 2013-2014 (not just February 2014), then that would work. Bests, --Seryo93 (talk) 14:35, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Cite error: There are <ref group=nb>
tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=nb}}
template (see the help page).