This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Underthemayofan (talk | contribs) at 05:29, 24 December 2021 (→WikiIslam). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:29, 24 December 2021 by Underthemayofan (talk | contribs) (→WikiIslam)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome to my talk page!
WikiIslam
Please do not delete content from reliable sources and replace it with content from an unreliable source, as you did with this edit and others at WikiIslam. Snuish (talk) 13:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Your sources are unreliable, as they are old and contradict the reliable sources that are up-to-date. Please stop using outdated sources.--Underthemayofan (talk) 17:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- I think you may not understand what "unreliable" and "reliable" mean on Misplaced Pages, since you seem to be using the terms in reverse. Please review WP:RS. Content published in scholarly journals, such as the content that you have attempted to remove, is generally considered reliable. Content from WikiIslam is generally not. Snuish (talk) 18:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Regarding the posting of messages on other user's talk pages, please ensure that your messages do not violate WP:CANVASS going forward should you continue to seek the involvement of additional editors. Snuish (talk) 19:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Your note in unnecessary, as nothing I wrote violates WP:CANVASS.--Underthemayofan (talk) 23:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- You chose an editor who has a sympathetic viewpoint to solicit input. "The audience must not be selected on the basis of their opinions..." Snuish (talk) 01:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Not true, I saw that he had taken an interest in it and asked for his help in continuing to improve the article. He was the latest named editor to take part. I was simply trying to improve the article.--Underthemayofan (talk) 01:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oh ok. In that case, you might want to alert other editors who've also expressed an interest in the topic in the past, like User:NarSakSasLee and User:Doug Weller, to broaden the consensus we might achieve. Snuish (talk) 03:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- No need, I think we're getting to a good place with it.--Underthemayofan (talk) 04:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Right. Exactly what I expected. Snuish (talk) 04:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- No need, I think we're getting to a good place with it.--Underthemayofan (talk) 04:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oh ok. In that case, you might want to alert other editors who've also expressed an interest in the topic in the past, like User:NarSakSasLee and User:Doug Weller, to broaden the consensus we might achieve. Snuish (talk) 03:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Not true, I saw that he had taken an interest in it and asked for his help in continuing to improve the article. He was the latest named editor to take part. I was simply trying to improve the article.--Underthemayofan (talk) 01:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
"...'cientific' and 'valid' critiques of the religion of Islam, similar in many way to the critiques that have been made of Christianity for centuries..." What is the relevant timestamp for this remark from the video? Snuish (talk) 05:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- This isn't the place, head over to article and I will cite it there.--Underthemayofan (talk) 05:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC)