This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Drabin23 (talk | contribs) at 00:01, 10 February 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:01, 10 February 2007 by Drabin23 (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Notability of Chicago Sun-Times Column On Chicago Public Schools' Preferential Treatment
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Chicago Sun-Times Column On Chicago Public Schools' Preferential Treatment) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Mhking 02:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Please elaborate as to why my addition is considered nonsense. The Chicago Sun-Times considered this issue important enough to be printed on page two. Shouldn't the neutral point of view include information that does more than paint CPS in a strictly positive light? My addition brings up a relevant issue about treatment that different schools receive within CPS. If you look at the basic skills test scores, you'll notice an enormous gulf between CPS's magnet and non-magnet schools. If you spend one day in both a magnet school and a non-magnet school, you'll notice that the reason for this is far greater than student ability. Drabin23 - 2/9/07