Misplaced Pages

User talk:Liberal Classic

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ALM scientist (talk | contribs) at 09:58, 22 February 2007 (→Mediation: why). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 09:58, 22 February 2007 by ALM scientist (talk | contribs) (→Mediation: why)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

Hello, Liberal Classic, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  Prolog 09:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. --Nlu (talk) 15:10, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome! Liberal Classic 15:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Liberal Classic, Sorry for damaging your fave white boy page: Bruce Dickinson. But please don't edit my page anymore in retaliation. I promise to stop, bc I don't want to be banned. But I am still pretyy certain that he produced BOC or Steve Buscemi wouldn't have played him so convincingly on MadTV. signed, User_talk:70.231.230.131

It looks like to me you were removing warnings from your talk page. Liberal Classic 04:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
I felt I was removing nasty ill intent from what I feel is a space where people go to find out about me. If someone wrote this on my house I would paint over it, wouldn't you? Meegs said he would ban me if I made a change again that I felt was true. So I won't make that change, bc I don't want to be banned. But to I have carry his scarlet letter? Signed, User_talk:70.231.230.131
The talk page is where people to go find out about you. That's one of the reasons warning messages appear there. From what I understand, user talk pages should be archived not blanked. However, you should consider creating an account instead of editing with an anon IP address. You removed a warning from your talk page with the edit summary saying "Bruce is gay". That's what attracted my attention to it. Liberal Classic 05:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


HELLO

After reading your bio I thought you would have found more humor in my edit to Michael Chertoff, but I guess your just doing your job. (Unsigned by User:Totallyawesome)

Yep. Liberal Classic 04:51, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Mediation

Liberal Classic, per your reasoned comments, I invite you to join this mediation should you be so inclined.Proabivouac 08:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I'll take a look. Thank you. Liberal Classic 14:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
I hope you realize that VirtualEye's comments do not reflect the views of the community. It is clear that he wishes to violate Misplaced Pages policy; otherwise, why would he ask for a private Email address? I hope you can make your points heard on the mediation page. Thanks for your opposition of censorship on religious grounds, --Hojimachongcon 04:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm sure they don't. Most of the commments have been reasonable, and this talk page does not seem as bad as some others I've read. I'm not sure exactly what to add to the mediation page. What I think I may do is cobble together the two or three posts I made from the article's talk page, and posting that under a new heading on the mediation page. Liberal Classic 04:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Your input is requested at Talk:Muhammad/Mediation#Suggestion. --Hojimachongcon 01:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Have you done any contribution in Muhammad article. Have you added any reference or created any new section. Why people who have no contribution in Muhammad article feel it fair for them to impose a picture on us? Many of them do not know anything about Muhammad too and they cannot answer even basic questions about him. --- ALM 09:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)