This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 12:50, 11 February 2023 (Archiving 1 discussion from User talk:Unexpectedlydian. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:50, 11 February 2023 by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion from User talk:Unexpectedlydian. (BOT))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Unexpectedlydian. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
DYK for Cleadon
On 15 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cleadon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the recreation area in Cleadon contains the remains of an 18th-century grotto? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cleadon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cleadon), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Marsden Rock
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marsden Rock you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Marsden Rock
On 4 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marsden Rock, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the naturally formed arch of Marsden Rock (pictured) collapsed in 1996 following a winter of storms? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marsden Rock. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Marsden Rock), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 15,714 views (1309.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2022 – nice work! |
Bruxton (talk) 17:06, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gateshead Millennium Bridge
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gateshead Millennium Bridge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, a human here. I've completed my review of the article; there is very little that needs fixing, though a paragraph on the tourist side would seem to be needed. Looking forward to seeing your response. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gateshead Millennium Bridge
The article Gateshead Millennium Bridge you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Gateshead Millennium Bridge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:21, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Gateshead Millennium Bridge
On 21 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gateshead Millennium Bridge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gateshead Millennium Bridge (pictured) is the world's first tilt bridge? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gateshead Millennium Bridge. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gateshead Millennium Bridge), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 13,037 views (1,086.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work! |
Bruxton (talk) 15:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Whitburn, Tyne and Wear
The article Whitburn, Tyne and Wear you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Whitburn, Tyne and Wear for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 15:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
April Editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
GAN: Whitburn
For some reason (perhaps I have inadvertently omitted to do something techie) the usual congrats message has not appeared here. Well, it has now. The article is safely added to the GA list and marked GA on its page and the associated talk page. Bravo/brava! (delete as applicable). Tim riley talk 21:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Tim riley Thank you for your review and for your message! Perhaps another technical thing - I can’t see the GA icon on the article. Is that something that should be added manually as well? Unexpectedlydian (talk) 22:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC)@Tim riley
- Oh, Lord! Let's wait 24 hours and see what happens. I really don't think I've omitted anything I ought to have done, and I vaguely recall something like this before with one or two of my GAN reviews, never really explained. Let's see. Meanwhile, my personal congratulations. Tim riley talk 22:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Good morning! I've followed this up here, and it seems we can add the GA badge manually if wanted or, as one editor suggests, simply leave things as they are. What think you? Tim riley talk 10:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for following this up, let’s add it manually :)@Tim riley Unexpectedlydian (talk) 10:41, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Good morning! I've followed this up here, and it seems we can add the GA badge manually if wanted or, as one editor suggests, simply leave things as they are. What think you? Tim riley talk 10:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, Lord! Let's wait 24 hours and see what happens. I really don't think I've omitted anything I ought to have done, and I vaguely recall something like this before with one or two of my GAN reviews, never really explained. Let's see. Meanwhile, my personal congratulations. Tim riley talk 22:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
New message from DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Angel of the North § Angel model at Eggleston Hall Gardens. DBaK (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Angel of the North
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Angel of the North you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HJ Mitchell -- HJ Mitchell (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ladnav no esool -- Ladnav no esool (talk) 14:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Marsden Rock
The article Marsden Rock you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marsden Rock for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, Unexpectedlydian, for your excellent, almost single-handed coverage of Marsden Rock. I often visited the site as a child in the 1940s and 1950s. I had not realized the arch had collapsed. Thanks also for all the women's biographies you have been writing. Great work!--Ipigott (talk) 10:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind message! Great to know you enjoyed reading the article. It should be featuring as a DYK soon. Unexpectedlydian (talk) 11:13, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
May 2022 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2022 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 10:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Bluey!
Thank you for your kind thankyou and I am glad I have not caused (too much) annoyance. Ermmmm … I'd better go and listen to it now, yesno? Cheers DBaK (talk) 14:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- No annoyance at all! Definitely have a listen, it's a wonderful little piece. The track in Silence & Music (2017) is a personal favourite. Although, it doesn't feature the soprano solo, but a full ensemble (see conversation with @DavidBrooks above!). Unexpectedlydian (talk) 14:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oh thanks so much – I love to have a recommendation! I have rushed off to get it, and a score. How lovely. I adore it when stuff like this happens here … my own musicianship (such as it is) can tend towards a certain narrowness, so something as gorgeous as this, to make me think, is very welcome. I also for historical reasons have a serious bit of a soft spot for Mr McC so this is grand. Cheers DBaK (talk) 23:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Perhaps I'll take a listen too. As described above, I have a personal soft spot for Rutter's crew. But, although Higginbottom is another Cambridge connection (I followed him at Corpus Christi College), I dislike his version. The acoustic is all wrong, and for me the boys' voices don't work. David Brooks (talk) 04:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oh thanks so much – I love to have a recommendation! I have rushed off to get it, and a score. How lovely. I adore it when stuff like this happens here … my own musicianship (such as it is) can tend towards a certain narrowness, so something as gorgeous as this, to make me think, is very welcome. I also for historical reasons have a serious bit of a soft spot for Mr McC so this is grand. Cheers DBaK (talk) 23:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
The Blue Bird updates
Thank you so much for continuing work on The Blue Bird. I hear it so much on various radio streams these days that I was surprised to find it missing. Two comments:
- A long time ago I'm sure I heard or read someone describe it as "the most impressionistic song in the English Language" or similar words. I can't find a source, although the much later Bitner comes close; did I imagine it?
- The description of the strophic form in "Background" is a slight non-sequitur as it's not directly connected to Blue Bird at that point. Do you think you can manage that connection?
A personal anecdote. At Cambridge in either 1970 or 1971, my now-wife and I were sitting on the bank of the Cam for the Choral Society's annual performance on the river. Those days (and maybe even now), after lighting lanterns on the punts, they would start the second half with The Blue Bird. As they sang, an actual bird flew up from the grass behind them and perched on a branch, as if to listen. It was very likely that John Rutter was there (he was a post-graduate student then) and I like to think the memory carried forward to the 1986 recording. David Brooks (talk) 18:49, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- @DavidBrooks Thank you for your kind message! I was similarly surprised to find out you only created the article back in December, it definitely feels like a piece which deserves an article of its own. Regarding your two comments, a Google search hasn't found anything which matches your quote, nor have any of the sources I've read so far (plenty about its general renown, however). I'll keep looking. And yes, I can address that point about strophic form - thanks for raising it. And thank you for sharing your anecdote, what a great story! Unexpectedlydian (talk) 19:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- On your user page: ], surely? I try not to edit other peoples' user pages :-) David Brooks (talk) 21:26, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for spotting! I'll change now :) Unexpectedlydian (talk) 09:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- You're very welcome. One question. Does Grove really say that CVS specified the soprano as solo? I'm sure that is a frequent practice, but it's not indicated in my copy – admittedly an American imprint, and I don't have the whole volume. When I conducted it (20 years ago!) we just split the sopranos because they outnumbered the altos anyway.David Brooks (talk) 13:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hmmm, whilst Grove doesn't specify that it's a solo, other sources do (the 2002 Dibble biography, for example). I've also just found the entry for The Blue Bird in The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Music (5 ed.), which does say it's or sop solo. However, the Oxford Dictionary also says it's Op.119 No.4 (rather than No.3), and that it was written in 1911, so not sure what's going on there. I'm not sure how to explain that the sop part can also be sung by a full sop section other than pointing towards the recordings, as nothing I've read so far explicitly says this. Unexpectedlydian (talk) 14:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Well, my original wording said "as...the first contralto part falls within the soprano range, it can be" performed either way, because the policy for musical works is you can make claims that are self-evident from the score. But I guess that is stretching the policy. David Brooks (talk) 04:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- @DavidBrooks FYI, I think the article is in a good state, so have submitted it to GAN. Hopefully getting the recognition the piece deserves! Unexpectedlydian (talk) 18:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sounds good, and good luck. But (as I'm banned from commenting on the submission) I'd really like more attention to the authenticity of the "solo" statement. It seems extremely unlikely to me that CVS would intend a solo and then not designate the chorus as SATB. On the other hand, did he really have that many altos in mind? I wonder who wrote that in CODM, and where they got it from. I just remembered I have the non-concise 1985 ODM (Kennedy) 1989 reprint and it says the same. David Brooks (talk) 14:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, I'll do some more digging and see how the article can reflect this discrepancy in the meantime! Unexpectedlydian (talk) 13:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sounds good, and good luck. But (as I'm banned from commenting on the submission) I'd really like more attention to the authenticity of the "solo" statement. It seems extremely unlikely to me that CVS would intend a solo and then not designate the chorus as SATB. On the other hand, did he really have that many altos in mind? I wonder who wrote that in CODM, and where they got it from. I just remembered I have the non-concise 1985 ODM (Kennedy) 1989 reprint and it says the same. David Brooks (talk) 14:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- @DavidBrooks FYI, I think the article is in a good state, so have submitted it to GAN. Hopefully getting the recognition the piece deserves! Unexpectedlydian (talk) 18:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Well, my original wording said "as...the first contralto part falls within the soprano range, it can be" performed either way, because the policy for musical works is you can make claims that are self-evident from the score. But I guess that is stretching the policy. David Brooks (talk) 04:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hmmm, whilst Grove doesn't specify that it's a solo, other sources do (the 2002 Dibble biography, for example). I've also just found the entry for The Blue Bird in The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Music (5 ed.), which does say it's or sop solo. However, the Oxford Dictionary also says it's Op.119 No.4 (rather than No.3), and that it was written in 1911, so not sure what's going on there. I'm not sure how to explain that the sop part can also be sung by a full sop section other than pointing towards the recordings, as nothing I've read so far explicitly says this. Unexpectedlydian (talk) 14:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- You're very welcome. One question. Does Grove really say that CVS specified the soprano as solo? I'm sure that is a frequent practice, but it's not indicated in my copy – admittedly an American imprint, and I don't have the whole volume. When I conducted it (20 years ago!) we just split the sopranos because they outnumbered the altos anyway.David Brooks (talk) 13:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for spotting! I'll change now :) Unexpectedlydian (talk) 09:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- On your user page: ], surely? I try not to edit other peoples' user pages :-) David Brooks (talk) 21:26, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Rejoice in the Lamb citations
I noticed your GA nomination of Rejoice in the Lamb (your page is still in my watchlist). Rather than commenting publicly, I'd just like to point out: Dibbles 1996 and Riddles 1996 have no referents. Anyway, does "Dibbles" refer to Jeremy Dibble? And Is "Riddles" the 2006 article or something else? I notice these things because I have a script that highlights missing CITEREF targets.
I sung this thing at Dulwich College mid 1960s. I can still remember the experience! David Brooks (talk) 13:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Ah thank you for spotting! I seem to have made up a new musicologist by combing the names Dibble and Riddles... I'll fix those now. I blame carelessness! Very useful script, I'll probably need it. Unexpectedlydian (talk) 15:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- You're welcome. In your common.js, you can add
importScript('User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js');which was the original, I think, but there are variants by users Svick and Trappist the monk (which has documentation at User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors) and yours truly. Mine adds a faint note in green showing the actual format of the target CITEREF within the expansion each CS1-style template, which makes it easier to correct the error.
- You're welcome. In your common.js, you can add
- Total change of topic: mention of Britten in the context of your user name reminds me of (I'll get there, I promise) Karl Jenkins's The Armed Man: Benedictus whose opening in D major rocks between that and an E major chord (sharpened 4th, get it?) although the idea doesn't carry forward into the vocal setting. After hearing it repeatedly on Classic FM (which I no longer listen to) I listened to BB's Dream which contains exactly the same idea, same chords, somewhere in the 2nd act. It's a simple trope so I wouldn't accuse KJ of plagiarism. David Brooks (talk) 16:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of The Blue Bird (Stanford)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Blue Bird (Stanford) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:41, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daß Wölf -- Daß Wölf (talk) 19:00, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for sticking with the nomination of Albert Freedman, I think your hard work has made it a much better article! Bruxton (talk) 21:47, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- You're welcome, it was fun :) Unexpectedlydiantalk 21:52, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of Angel of the North
The article Angel of the North you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Angel of the North for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HJ Mitchell -- HJ Mitchell (talk) 12:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rejoice in the Lamb
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rejoice in the Lamb you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:02, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich)
The article Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:42, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art
The article Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 14:41, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
DYK for The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler
On 15 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that readers of The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler often incorrectly assume that the main character is a boy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of That's Not My... (book series)
The article That's Not My... (book series) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:That's Not My... (book series) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of The Blue Bird (Stanford)
The article The Blue Bird (Stanford) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Blue Bird (Stanford) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:41, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Blue Bird (Stanford)
The article The Blue Bird (Stanford) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Blue Bird (Stanford) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
An unexpectedly Lydian funeral anthem
Jimmy Macmillan's anthem Who shall separate us?, heard at the Abbey yesterday, is ostensibly in E major but all the A's on the first stanza are unexpectedly sharpened. So of course I thought of you. David Brooks (talk) 19:13, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- A great example of an unexpected lydian! And a great piece. I'm sure it will be featuring in the repertoires of choirs for years to come! Unexpectedlydiantalk 21:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Gruffalo
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Gruffalo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler
The article The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daß Wölf -- Daß Wölf (talk) 17:21, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of Rejoice in the Lamb
The article Rejoice in the Lamb you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rejoice in the Lamb for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rejoice in the Lamb
The article Rejoice in the Lamb you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rejoice in the Lamb for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich)
The article Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:41, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Martini Maccomo
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Martini Maccomo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Orson12345 -- Orson12345 (talk) 22:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Martini Maccomo
On 27 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Martini Maccomo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Martini Maccomo accidentally shot someone in the eye while performing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Martini Maccomo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Martini Maccomo), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
WiG Editathon Barnstar
|
Women in Green Editathon — October '22 | |
| Thank you for your excellent contributions as GA reviewer for Jane Pierce at the WiG Wildcard Edition editathon! Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 14:48, 12 November 2022 (UTC) |