Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Leebo (talk | contribs) at 23:05, 26 March 2007 (do not blank the discussion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Image tagging for Image:Th MySpace Secret Shows logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Th MySpace Secret Shows logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Misplaced Pages:Image use policy
• Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 05:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Reply

I'm not upset with you; learning Misplaced Pages's policies in the face of many experienced editors who are discussing removing your contributions is undoubtedly frustrating. My statement was that it has no third party sources, not that it's an advertisement. One good point in the discussion was that while MySpace and the bands are notable, the sponsorship of the shows by others through MySpace isn't necessarily notable. I'm sorry that you feel that your time has been wasted. Leebo /C 22:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

It sounds like you're saying some combination of "it should have an article because it has a fanbase" and "it should have an article because many other non-notable articles exist", neither of which are valid arguments. It's not that I "have it out" for your article. It came up on the log deletion discussions (there are hundreds every day) and I commented in it. I'm not running around blindly looking for articles to delete. You can see, I have contributed several new articles myself. I looked at the article and asked myself if it meets Misplaced Pages's policies and I felt it didn't and explained myself. If you disagree, that's fine, but I expect an argument ground in the same policies. Leebo /C 22:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

People have done that to me (See:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/DynaMed). It's called disrupting Misplaced Pages to prove a point. Leebo /C 22:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I gave my opinion, I'm not sure what else there is to say. I'm not sure either why you singled me out to ask all of these questions, it wasn't me who nominated your article for deletion. I'm only one of many who commented. Leebo /C 22:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

JuJube nominated the article. His comment is the one at the very top of the discussion. You may have noticed mine first because I bold my name in my signature, and as the first commenter I started my post with the bolded Delete (the nominator doesn't because it's assumed that he's saying Delete). It probably would have been courteous for him to leave you a note telling you the discussion was taking place, but there's not much that can be done about that now. Leebo /C 22:52, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Blanking the discussion

I'm not sure if you did this by accident, but make sure you don't do it again. The discussion is permanent and repeated removal of other editors comments will be considered vandalism. Leebo /C 23:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)