This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chiswick Chap (talk | contribs) at 11:00, 23 January 2024 (→The Plot section is too long: done ...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:00, 23 January 2024 by Chiswick Chap (talk | contribs) (→The Plot section is too long: done ...)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Lord of the Rings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The Lord of the Rings is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Lord of the Rings has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 5, 2006. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
The Plot section is too long
The Plot section of the article is way too long. It just gives the plot outlines from their respective pages verbatim. Inclusion of the Prologue is unnecessary here (as it's on the FOTR page) and the Appendices need not be so detailed here either. The plot of each of the volumes should be condensed and need not be split by book - this level of detail should be left for the individual volume pages. – Dyolf87 (talk) 13:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- I agree it's a bit too long.--Jack Upland (talk) 00:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- All right, condensed. I do hope this doesn't start the fans editing the plot all over again: the #included plots did deter casual editing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages articles that use Oxford spelling
- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English
- Misplaced Pages former featured articles
- Misplaced Pages good articles
- Language and literature good articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- Former good article nominees
- GA-Class level-4 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in Arts
- GA-Class vital articles in Arts
- GA-Class Tolkien articles
- Top-importance Tolkien articles
- GA-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- GA-Class novel articles
- Top-importance novel articles
- GA-Class Fantasy fiction articles
- Top-importance Fantasy fiction articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- GA-Class children and young adult literature articles
- Top-importance children and young adult literature articles
- GA-Class media franchise articles
- Top-importance media franchise articles
- WikiProject Media franchises articles
- GA-Class culture articles
- High-importance culture articles
- WikiProject Culture articles
- Misplaced Pages pages referenced by the press