Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ravenpuff (talk | contribs) at 10:58, 3 April 2023 (Ravenpuff moved page Talk:Conservative Monday Club to Talk:Monday Club without leaving a redirect: Use WP:COMMONNAME (different to the official name)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Paisley

I've reverted this edit as I don't see why Paisley's opinion is relevant and why the invite would be "despite" it. Please discuss. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 14:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

"The club also took a hard line on the return of White Russians by the British Army to Joseph Stalin's Red Army in 1945–46, who executed nearly all of them. In this respect it gave its support to Count Nikolai Tolstoy, historian and author of Victims of Yalta and The Minister and the Massacres" Firstly, these are not White Russians at all, the term White Russians is defined for representatives of one of the parties to the civil war in Russia and for white emigrants from Russia in the period after the end of the civil war in Russia, some of them subsequently collaborated with the Nazis, for which they were executed after the Second World War in the USSR, Nikolai Tolstoy generally writes about people transferred to the Soviet Union by Britain and the USA, most of whom were citizens of the USSR and for the most part they spent time in exile or a gulag, but only the command was shot and nothing more, themselves books Nikolai Tolstoy are frankly controversial and even unsubstantiated character Цйфыву (talk) 19:32, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Political position?

This is User: Political Dweeb with a question on this organisations political position. This Misplaced Pages article on the Conservative Monday Club shows that this organisation tried to exclude anyones that were Nazis from the CMC. Does this mean that the Conservative Monday Club is opposed to extreme forms of discrimination such as neo-Nazism and Holocaust denial while still believing and promoting traditional, social and National conservative beliefs?

Apart from this question who is the leader of this pressure group and what ways do they promote their views in politics?Political Dweeb (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 13:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Titles in list of MPs

I have once again removed the titles persistently added by an IP editor from the list of MPs. They serve no purpose to the list, it's pure aristocruft and the majority of the titles didn't even apply at the time. If people want to know what titles people received in later life, they can go to the linked articles. 2 lines of K₃₀₃

Far right

On what evidence has the decision to brand the Conservative Monday Club as far-right been made? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.5.122.80 (talk) 11:42, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Name?

Where does it explain this? Turkeyphan 19:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Overview redundant

It is the lede that is meant to provide the overview. It is not necessary to start the main article with a section that performs this task. This section should be deleted. Valetude (talk) 21:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Update - I have today re-edited the article accordingly. Valetude (talk) 04:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Update

...membership is now said to be back below 600...

That statement has been on the page for some years. Can we have an authenticated figure, suitably dated? Valetude (talk) 17:15, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

The Founders

Seems odd that none of the club's four founders - Paul Bristol, Ian Greig, Cedric Gunnery, Anthony Maclaren - merits their own wiki page, while so many others of its earlier members do. It might be interesting to learn a little about them. Valetude (talk) 22:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

• All unassessed articles
• Start-Class Conservatism articles
• Low-importance Conservatism articles
• WikiProject Conservatism articles
• Start-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
• Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles