Misplaced Pages

User talk:Lisha2037

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DPL bot (talk | contribs) at 17:59, 2 May 2024 (dablink notification message (see the FAQ)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:59, 2 May 2024 by DPL bot (talk | contribs) (dablink notification message (see the FAQ))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

July 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Andrewrp. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Religion in the United Kingdom— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Andrewrp 01:07, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please have a look also at the information at this page, which appears every time you edit J. K. Rowling. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I appreciate your input into this matter but what I posted isn’t a matter of opinion but rather fact. So it’s not about being contentious. If it was there would not be a whole article on the Cass Review on WKPD. Rowling did in fact tweet that and that was the report she was talking about. I never stated whether she’s right or wrong. I felt the information on her profile was more imbalanced towards her opposition which I think is not proper for a Misplaced Pages article. So I wanted to put out something she herself said and something that was commissioned by UK’s health agency. Lisha2037 (talk) 11:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leonardo DiCaprio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elle. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)