Misplaced Pages

Frame-dragging

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gravitom (talk | contribs) at 19:02, 14 April 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:02, 14 April 2007 by Gravitom (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This article needs attention from an expert in Physics. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article. WikiProject Physics may be able to help recruit an expert.
General relativity
Spacetime curvature schematic G μ ν + Λ g μ ν = κ T μ ν {\displaystyle G_{\mu \nu }+\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }={\kappa }T_{\mu \nu }}
Fundamental concepts
Phenomena
Spacetime
  • Equations
  • Formalisms
Equations
Formalisms
Advanced theory
Solutions
Scientists

Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity predicts that rotating bodies drag spacetime around themselves in a phenomenon referred to as frame-dragging. The rotational frame-dragging effect was first derived from the theory of general relativity in 1918 by the Austrian physicists Joseph Lense and Hans Thirring, and is also known as the Lense-Thirring effect. Lense and Thirring predicted that the rotation of an object would alter space and time, dragging a nearby object out of position compared to the predictions of Newtonian physics. This is the frame-dragging effect. The predicted effect is incredibly small — about one part in a few trillion — which means that you have to look at something very massive, or build an instrument that is incredibly sensitive. More generally, the subject of field effects caused by moving matter is known as gravitomagnetism.

Frame dragging effects

Rotational frame-dragging (Lense-Thirring effect) appears in the general principle of relativity and similar theories in the vicinity of rotating massive objects. Under the Lense-Thirring effect, the frame of reference in which a clock ticks the fastest is one which is rotating around the object as viewed by a distant observer. This also means that light traveling in the direction of rotation of the object will move around the object faster than light moving against the rotation as seen by a distant observer. It is now the best-known effect, partly thanks to the Gravity Probe B experiment.

Accelerational frame dragging is the similarly inevitable result of the general principle of relativity, applied to acceleration. Although it arguably has equal theoretical legitimacy to the "rotational" effect, the difficulty of obtaining an experimental verification of the effect means that it receives much less discussion and is often omitted from articles on frame-dragging (but see Einstein, 1921).

Mathematical treatment of frame-dragging

Measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect using the LAGEOS satellites

Another consequence of the gravitomagnetic field of a central rotating body is the so-called Lense-Thirring effect (Lense and Thirring 1918). It consists of small secular precessions of the longitude of the ascending node O and the argument of pericenter ? of the path of a test mass freely orbiting the spinning main body. For the nodes of the LAGEOS Earth's artificial satellites they amount to ~30 milliarcseconds per year (ms/yr or ms yr - 1). Such tiny precessions would totally be swamped by the much larger classical precessions induced by the even zonal harmonic coefficients of the multipolar expansion of the Newtonian part of the terrestrial gravitational potential. Even the most recent Earth gravity models from the dedicated CHAMP and GRACE missions would not allow to know the even zonal harmonics to a sufficiently high degree of accuracy in order to extract the Lense-Thirring effect from the analysis of the node of only one satellite.

Ciufolini proposed in 1996 to overcome this problem by suitably combining the nodes of LAGEOS and LAGEOS II and the perigee of LAGEOS II in order to cancel out all the static and time-dependent perturbations due to the first two even zonal harmonics (Ciufolini 1996). Various analyses with the pre-CHAMP/GRACE JGM-3 and EGM96 Earth gravity models were performed by Ciufolini et al. over observational time spans of some years (Ciufolini et al. 1996; 1997; 1998).

The opportunities offered by the new generation of Earth gravity models from CHAMP and, especially, GRACE allowed to discard the perigee of LAGEOS II, as pointed out by Pavlis (2002) and Ries et al. (2003b). In Ciufolini and Pavlis (2004) a test was performed with the 2nd generation GRACE-only EIGEN-GRACE02S Earth gravity model over a time span of 11 years (Ciufolini and Pavlis 2004). The total error budget was at a level of 10%.

A number of recent and very detailed papers have fully confirmed the 10% error budget of the measurement published by Ciufolini and Pavlis in 2004, see, e.g., Ciufolini and Pavlis 2005, Lucchesi 2005, and Ciufolini, Pavlis and Peron 2006.

The measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect by Ciufolini and Pavlis in 2004 is based on the innovative ideas published since 1984 by Ciufolini who proposed the use of the nodes of two laser ranged satellites of LAGEOS-type to measure the Lense-Thirring effect. Indeed, the key idea of using the nodes of two laser ranged satellites of LAGEOS-type to measure the Lense-Thirring effect was first published in Ciufolini 1984 and Ciufolini 1986 and later studied in Ciufolini 1989 and Tapley, Ciufolini et al. 1989. The use of the combination of the nodes only of a number of laser ranged satellites of LAGEOS-type was first published in Ciufolini 1989, p. 3102, see also Ciufolini and Wheeler 1995, p. 336, where is written "... A solution would be to orbit several high-altitude, laser-ranged satellites, similar to LAGEOS, to measure J2,J4,J6, etc, and one satellite to measure ....". The use of the nodes of LAGEOS and LAGEOS 2, together with the explicit expression of the LAGEOS satellites nodal equations, was first proposed in Ciufolini 1996; the explicit expression of this combination of the nodes only of the LAGEOS satellites, that is however a trivial step on the basis of the explicit equations given in Ciufolini 1996, was presented by Ciufolini at the 2002 I-SIGRAV school and published in its proceedings, see Ciufolini 2002: precisely this observable was used by Ciufolini and Pavlis in 2004 for their accurate measurement of the frame-dragging effect on the LAGEOS satellites nodes, see Ciufolini and Pavlis 2004. For a study of the determination of the Lense-Thirring effect using laser-ranged satellites see also Peterson 1997. The use of the GRACE-derived gravitational models, when available, to measure the Lense-Thirring effect with accuracy of a few percent was, since many years, a well known possibility to all the researchers in this field and was presented during the SIGRAV 2000 conference by Pavlis, Pavlis 2002, and published in its proceedings, and was published by Ries et al. in the proceedings of the 1998 William Fairbank conference and of the 2003 13th Int. Laser Ranging Workshop, Ries et al. 2003a and 2003b, where Ries et al. concluded that, in the measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect using the GRACE gravity models and the LAGEOS and LAGEOS 2 satellites: "a more current error assessment is probably at the few percent level ...".

Incidentally, two problems of the GP-B mission have been pointed out in NATURE, Vol. 444, 21/28 December 2006. Even though these problems might be, in part, taken care of by the GP-B data analysis, no other team would probably be able to clearly understand the corrections necessary in the data analysis to take care of these problems and thus probably no other group would be able to repeat the data analyis with the understanding of what is beeing done.

Incidentally, a recent analysis of Iorio has been shown to be wrong by at least a factor ten thousand (see: Sindoni et al 2007, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0701141) because he did not consider basic SYSTEMATIC ERRORS; so there is no hope to measure the Lense-Thirring effect using the Mars Global Surveyor, indeed the associated systematic errors are at least 40 times larger than the Lense-Thirring effect to be measured.

The fact that the previous claim against Iorio's analysis is totally absurd is clearly shown by the mere fact that such an alleged huge bias is COMPLETELY absent from the MGS data, which, instead, are built, by construction, to account just for ALL the errors, systematic or not. The authors simply forget that analytical speculations about this or that effect must ultimately cope with the real world.

For a much more balanced and concise exposition of the basic facts of the experimental efforts toward the measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect, along with all the relevant references properly cited, see the section below.

Experimental tests of frame-dragging

In 1976 Van Patten and Everitt proposed to implement a dedicated mission aimed to measure the Lense-Thirring node precession of a pair of counter-orbiting spacecraft to be placed in terrestrial polar orbits and endowed with drag-free apparatus. A somewhat equivalent, cheaper version of such an idea was put forth in 1986 by Ciufolini who proposed to launch a passive, geodetic satellite in an orbit identical to that of the LAGEOS satellite, launched in 1976, apart from the orbital planes which should have been displaced by 180 deg apart: the so-called butterfly configuration. The measurable quantity was, in this case, the sum of the nodes of LAGEOS and of the new spacecraft, later named LAGEOS III, LARES, WEBER-SAT. Although extensively studied by various groups, such an idea has not yet been implemented. The butterfly configuration would allow, in principle, to measure not only the sum of the nodes but also the difference of the perigees, although such Keplerian orbital elements are more affected by the non-gravitational perturbations like the direct solar radiation pressure: the use of the active, drag-free technology would be required. Other proposed approaches involved the use of a single satellite to be placed in near polar orbit of low altitude, but such a strategy has been shown to be unfeasible.

Limiting ourselves to the scenarios involving existing orbiting bodies, the first proposal to use the LAGEOS satellite and the Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) technique to measure the Lense-Thirring effect dates back to 1977-1978. Tests have started to be effectively performed by using the LAGEOS and LAGEOS II satellites in 1996, according to a strategy involving the use of a suitable combination of the nodes of both satellites and the perigee of LAGEOS II. The latest tests with the LAGEOS satellites have been performed in 2004-2006 by discarding the perigee of LAGEOS II and using a linear combination involving only the nodes of both the spacecraft.

Although the predictions of general relativity are compatible with the experimental results, the realistic evaluation of the total error raised a debate. Another test of the Lense-Thirring effect in the gravitational field of Mars, performed by suitably interpreting the data of the Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) spacecraft, has been recently reported. Also such a test raised a debate. Attempts to detect the Lense-Thirring effect induced by the Sun's rotation on the orbits of the inner planets of the Solar System have been reported as well: the predictions of general relativity are compatible with the estimated corrections to the perihelia precessions, although the errors are still large. The system of the Galilean satellites of Jupiter was investigated as well, following the original suggestion by Lense and Thirring. The Gravity Probe B experiment is currently under way to experimentally measure another gravitomagentic effect, i.e. the Schiff precession of a gyroscope, to an expected 1% accuracy or better.

See also

References

  1. Thirring, H. Über die Wirkung rotierender ferner Massen in der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie. Physikalische Zeitschrift 19, 33 (1918).
  2. Thirring, H. Berichtigung zu meiner Arbeit: "Über die Wirkung rotierender Massen in der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie". Physikalische Zeitschrift 22, 29 (1921).
  3. Lense, J. and Thirring, H. Über den Einfluss der Eigenrotation der Zentralkörper auf die Bewegung der Planeten und Monde nach der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie. Physikalische Zeitschrift 19 156-63 (1918)
  4. Einstein, A The Meaning of Relativity (contains transcripts of his 1921 Princeton lectures).
  5. Van Patten, R.A., Everitt, C.W.F., Possible Experiment with Two Counter-Orbiting Drag-Free Satellites to Obtain a New Test of Einsteins's General Theory of Relativity and Improved Measurements in Geodesy, Phys. Rev. Lett., 36, 629-632, 1976.
  6. Van Patten, R.A., Everitt, C.W.F., A possible experiment with two counter-rotating drag-free satellites to obtain a new test of Einstein’s general theory of relativity and improved measurements in geodesy, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 13, 429-447, 1976.
  7. Ciufolini I., Measurement of Lense-Thirring Drag on High-Altitude Laser-Ranged Artificial Satellites, Phys. Rev. Lett., 56, 278-281, 1986.
  8. Ries, J.C., Eanes, R.J., Watkins, M.M., Tapley, B., Joint NASA/ASI Study on Measuring the Lense-Thirring Precession Using a Second LAGEOS Satellite, CSR-89-3, Center for Space Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 1989.
  9. Iorio, L., Lucchesi, D.M., and Ciufolini, I., The LARES Mission Revisited: An Alternative Scenario, Class. Quantum Grav., 19, 4311-4325, 2002.
  10. Iorio, L., A new proposal for measuring the Lense-Thirring effect with a pair of supplementary satellites in the gravitational field of the Earth, Phys. Lett. A, 308, 81-84, 2003.
  11. Iorio, L., On a new observable for measuring the Lense-Thirring effect with Satellite Laser Ranging, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 35, 1583-1595, 2003.
  12. Iorio, L., Lucchesi, D.M., LAGEOS-type Satellites in Critical Supplementary Orbital Configuration and the Lense--Thirring Effect Detection, Class. Quantum Grav., 20, 2477-2490, 2003.
  13. Lucchesi, D.M., Paolozzi, A., A cost effective approach for LARES satellite, paper presented at XVI Congresso Nazionale AIDAA (24-28 Sept. 2001, Palermo), 2001.
  14. Ciufolini, I., On the orbit of the LARES satellite, (Preprint http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0609081), 2006.
  15. Peterson, G.E., Estimation of the Lense-Thirring precession using laser-ranged satellites, CSR-97-1, Center for Space Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 1997.
  16. Iorio, L., A critical approach to the concept of a polar, low-altitude LARES satellite, Class. Quantum Grav., 19, L175-L183, 2002.
  17. Iorio, L., A comment on the paper "On the orbit of the LARES satellite", by I. Ciufolini, Planet. Space Sci., at press, (Preprint http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0609097) 2007.
  18. Cugusi, L., Proverbio E. Relativistic effects on the Motion of the Earth's. Satellites, paper presented at the International Symposium on Satellite Geodesy in Budapest from June 28 to July 1, 1977, J. of Geodesy, 51, 249-252, 1977.
  19. Cugusi, L., Proverbio, E., Relativistic Effects on the Motion of Earth's Artificial Satellites, Astron. Astrophys, 69, 321-325, 1978.
  20. Ciufolini, I., Lucchesi, D.M., Vespe, F., Mandiello, A., Measurement of Dragging of Inertial Frames and Gravitomagnetic Field Using Laser-Ranged Satellites, Il Nuovo Cimento A, 109, 575-590, 1996.
  21. Ciufolini, I., On a new method to measure the gravitomagnetic field using two orbiting satellites., Il Nuovo Cimento A, 109, 1709-1720, 1996.
  22. Ciufolini, I., and Pavlis, E.C., A confirmation of the general relativistic prediction of the Lense-Thirring effect, Nature, 431, 958-960, 2004
  23. Ciufolini, I., Pavlis, E.C., and Peron, R., Determination of frame-dragging using Earth gravity models from CHAMP and GRACE, New Astron., 11, 527-550, 2006.
  24. Pavlis, E.C., Geodetic contributions to gravitational experiments in space. In: Cianci, R., Collina, R., Francaviglia, M., Fré, P. (Eds.), Recent Developments in General Relativity. 14th SIGRAV Conference on General Relativity and Gravitational Physics, Genova, Italy, September 18-22, 2000. Springer, Milano, pp. 217-233, 2002.
  25. Iorio, L., Morea, A., The impact of the new Earth gravity models on the measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 36, 1321-1333, 2004. (Preprint http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0304011).
  26. Ries, J.C., Eanes, R.J., Tapley, B.D., Lense-Thirring Precession Determination from Laser Ranging to Artificial Satellites. In: Ruffini, R., Sigismondi, C. (Eds.), Nonlinear Gravitodynamics. The Lense-Thirring Effect, World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 201-211, 2003a.
  27. Ries, J.C., Eanes, R.J., Tapley, B.D., Peterson, G.E., Prospects for an Improved Lense-Thirring Test with SLR and the GRACE Gravity Mission. In: Noomen, R., Klosko, S., Noll, C., Pearlman, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Laser Ranging Workshop, NASA CP 2003-212248, NASA Goddard, Greenbelt, 2003b. (Preprint http://cddisa.gsfc.nasa.gov/lw13/lw$\_${proceedings}.html$\#$science).
  28. Iorio, L., On the reliability of the so far performed tests for measuring the Lense-Thirring effect with the LAGEOS satellites, New Astron., 10, 603-615, 2005.
  29. Ciufolini, I., and Pavlis, E.C., On the Measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect Using the Nodes of the LAGEOS Satellites in reply to "On the reliability of the so-far performed tests for measuring the Lense-Thirring effect with the LAGEOS satellites" by L. Iorio, New Astron., 10, 636-651, 2005.
  30. Lucchesi, D.M., The impact of the even zonal harmonics secular variations on the Lense-Thirring effect measurement with the two Lageos satellites, Int. J. of Mod. Phys. D, 14, 1989-2023, 2005.
  31. Iorio, L., A critical analysis of a recent test of the Lense-Thirring effect with the LAGEOS satellites, J. of Geodesy, 80, 128-136, 2006.
  32. Iorio, L., An assessment of the measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect in the Earth gravity field, in reply to: ``On the measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect using the nodes of the LAGEOS satellites, in reply to ``On the reliability of the so far performed tests for measuring the Lense-Thirring effect with the LAGEOS satellites" by L. Iorio," by I. Ciufolini and E. Pavlis, Planet. Space Sci., 55, 503-511, 2007.
  33. Iorio, L., A note on the evidence of the gravitomagnetic field of Mars, Class. Quantum Grav., 23, 5451-5454, 2006.
  34. Iorio, L., Testing frame-dragging with the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft in the gravitational field of Mars, (Preprint http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0701042), 2007.
  35. Krogh, K., Iorio's "high-precision measurement" of frame-dragging with the Mars Global Surveyor, (Preprint http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0701653), 2007.
  36. Iorio, L., Reply to "Iorio's "high-precision measurement" of frame dragging with the Mars Global Surveyor", by Kris Krogh, (Preprint http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0701146), 2007.
  37. Sindoni, G., Paris, C., Ialongo, P., On the Systematic Errors in the Detection of the Lense-Thirring Effect with a Mars Orbiter, (http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0701141), 2007.
  38. Iorio, L., Reply to "On the Systematic Errors in the Detection of the Lense-Thirring Effect with a Mars Orbiter", by Giampiero Sindoni, Claudio Paris and Paolo Ialongo, (Preprint http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0701159), 2007.
  39. Felici, G., The meaning of systematic errors, a comment to "Reply to On the Systematic Errors in the Detection of the Lense-Thirring Effect with a Mars Orbiter", by Lorenzo Iorio, (Preprint http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0703020), 2007.
  40. Iorio, L., Reply to "The meaning of systematic errors, a comment to "Reply to On the Systematic Errors in the Detection of the Lense-Thirring Effect with a Mars Orbiter", by Lorenzo Iorio", by G. Felici, (Preprint http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0703042), 2007.
  41. Iorio, L., First preliminary tests of the general relativistic gravitomagnetic field of the Sun and new constraints on a Yukawa-like fifth force from planetary data, gr-qc/0507041, 2005
  42. Pitjeva, E.V., Relativistic Effects and Solar Oblateness from Radar Observations of Planets and Spacecraft. Astron. Lett., 31, 340-349, 2005.
  43. Iorio, L., and Lainey, V., The Lense-Thirring effect in the Jovian system of the Galilean satellites and its measurability, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 14, 2039-2050, 2005.
  44. Everitt, C.W.F, The Gyroscope Experiment I. General Description and Analysis of Gyroscope Performance. In: Bertotti, B. (Ed.), Proc. Int. School Phys. "Enrico Fermi" Course LVI. New Academic Press, New York, pp. 331-360, 1974. Reprinted in: Ruffini, R.J., Sigismondi, C. (Eds.), Nonlinear Gravitodynamics. The Lense-Thirring Effect. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 439-468, 2003.
  45. Everitt, C.W.F., et al., Gravity Probe B: Countdown to Launch. In: Laemmerzahl, C., Everitt, C.W.F., Hehl, F.W. (Eds.), Gyros, Clocks, Interferometers...: Testing Relativistic Gravity in Space. Springer, Berlin, pp. 52-82, 2001.
  46. Pugh, G.E., Proposal for a Satellite Test of the Coriolis Prediction of General Relativity, WSEG, Research Memorandum No. 11, 1959. Reprinted in: Ruffini, R.J., Sigismondi, C. (Eds.), Nonlinear Gravitodynamics. The Lense-Thirring Effect. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 414-426, 2003.
  47. Schiff, L., On Experimental Tests of the General Theory of Relativity, Am. J. of Phys., 28, 340-343, 1960.

External links

An early version of this article was adapted from public domain material from http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/ast06nov97_1.htm

Categories: