This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Liz (talk | contribs) at 07:18, 16 November 2024 (→Great new candidate: Comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:18, 16 November 2024 by Liz (talk | contribs) (→Great new candidate: Comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Liz
|
This is the talk page for discussing a candidate for election to the Arbitration Committee. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|||
| |||
Great new candidate
- Liz's candidacy has my full support: never been on the committee before but has experience through being a clerk, has many years of experience as an editor and admin, supports transparency when possible and from what I've observed, takes a moderate rather than rash approach to handling issues. starship.paint (talk / cont) 07:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- As someone who visits AfD once in a while, I am thrilled to see Liz here. Her calmness in handling heated conflicts between editors is always refreshing and is the kind of skill a good arb needs. Thank you for running! Toadspike 00:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Liz's candidacy has my full support shows great calmness and will be a good arb.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Glad to see someone with intellectual maturity here. — hako9 (talk) 01:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- New York Brad's sister. Carrite (talk) 02:29, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the support, it is truly unexpected and appreciated. Considering the critique I have seen of ARBCOM candidates, both past and present, I think the word that describes me is uncontroversial, I don't take rash actions. In fact, if anything, I can see my colleagues urging me to "C'mon and hurry up!" Liz 07:18, 16 November 2024 (UTC)