This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 08:53, 27 November 2024 (Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:RA0808/Archives2024/November. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:53, 27 November 2024 by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:RA0808/Archives2024/November. (BOT))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Menu
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:
- Be civil.
- I am not an administrator and I cannot undelete a deleted page, please contact the deleting administrator for that.
- I may rename or consolidate sections for the sake of organization, but will never change the text of your message.
- Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
- Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. Use the {{ping}} on your talk page or a {{talkback}} template here to remind me.
- To initiate a new conversation on this page click on this link.
- Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
- Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
- Remember to sign your comments by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Canadian Conflict of Laws Category
Hi, after reverting your categories edit yesterday on Vita Food Products Inc v Unus Shipping Co Ltd, I went through the edit history and found that the same issue about how to categorise this case came up a year ago. I had forgotten that. I decided to see if I could create a category that would solve the problem. I'm not good with creating categories, and have to work my way through the Help page every time I try to create one, but I think I've done it now. Please take a look at the page and the new category, and let me know if there are any problems. Thanks for drawing it to my attention. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 16:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Reference re Genetic Non-Discrimination Act
A tag has been placed on Reference re Genetic Non-Discrimination Act requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 23:54, 23 November 2024 (UTC)