Misplaced Pages

Talk:Thomas More

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AntientNestor (talk | contribs) at 06:06, 1 January 2025 (→An "amateur" theologian?: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 06:06, 1 January 2025 by AntientNestor (talk | contribs) (→An "amateur" theologian?: Reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thomas More article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 6 months 
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment / Politics and Government / Science and Academia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
WikiProject iconUniversity of Oxford High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Philosophers / Social and political / Religion / Medieval Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Philosophers
Taskforce icon
Social and political philosophy
Taskforce icon
Philosophy of religion
Taskforce icon
Medieval philosophy
WikiProject iconCatholicism High‑importance
WikiProject iconThomas More is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Catholicism task list:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconChristianity: Saints / Anglicanism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Saints (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconPolitics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWriting systems Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUniversal Basic Income (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Universal Basic Income, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Universal Basic IncomeWikipedia:WikiProject Universal Basic IncomeTemplate:WikiProject Universal Basic IncomeUniversal Basic Income
WikiProject iconLatin Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on May 16, 2004 and July 6, 2011.

Text and/or other creative content from Thomas More was copied or moved into Beaufort House (Chelsea). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Wolsey

The current article says "His early actions against the Protestant Reformation included aiding Wolsey in preventing Lutheran books from being imported into England, spying on and investigating suspected Protestants, especially publishers, and arresting anyone holding in his possession, transporting, or distributing Bibles and other materials of the Protestant Reformation. " However, More did not actually work for Wolsey (did he?): indeed he was on the King's Bench and actively helped bring Wolsey down. I could not get a look at the source, but I am dubious that this is what MacCulloch's book says (though we would expect MacCulloch not to take a positive view). I am also putting making it "unauthorized bibles", as plain "bibles" is simply wrong. Rick Jelliffe (talk) 03:58, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

I own MacCulloch's Cromwell and I looked over the pages given in the reference. You are right: MacCulloch compares the anti-heretic actions of both men (“Gone were the days of Cardinal Wolsey, when no one was burned at the stake for heresy: More had a positive relish for burning heretics.”) but does not say that More assisted Wolsey.--AntientNestor (talk) 07:07, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

References

  1. MacCulloch, Diarmaid (27 September 2018). Thomas Cromwell : a life. pp. 160–62. ISBN 978-1-84614-429-5.

"Barrister"

A recent edit removed the description of "lawyer" and replaced it with "barrister". Technically, this is correct, but too restrictive. For example: More's early legal work included commercial lawyering for the Mercers' Company and negotiating new terms for a cloth trade deal with Flanders. The common usage then to describe him would only be "lawyer". I suggest reinstating "lawyer".--AntientNestor (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Done. Added a further ref: both now support "lawyer".--AntientNestor (talk) 20:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Execution allegations

I have pulled out the material on the controversy of whether More tortured and sentenced heretics to be burned into its own section. I have added many citations and re-phrased much material. I have tried to add both pro- and anti-More sources, for balance and NPOV. I think some recent sources, especially the Richard Rex article, are very useful.

To prepare and research, I first updated the Star Chamber section, in particular concerning the scope and limits of their power.

The thing that has struck me, reading various sources and allegations, is that many sources pass on information uncritically, without attending to the basic issues of legality, jurisdiction, and procedure. Consequently, many of the sources lack credibility to that degree.

In particular, what is raising my eyebow are the often-repeated statements that link More's time as Lord Chancellor with the number heretic executions that happened in England during that time: the idea seems to be that More was like the boss of England, so every execution that happened happened because he like directed it and stuff. "When More was Lord Chancellor, six heretics were executed" becomes "Under More, 6 heretics were executed" or "More executed six heretics" to "More wanted to exterminate all Protestants".

That More, the man who introduced the notion of fairness (equity) into English law, and who relied on legal principles against self-incrimination for his very life, was somehow a total cowboy taking the law into his own hands when it came to heretics. I mean, anything is possible, but it looks like a situation where you would demand your WP:RS sources provide hard evidence rather than what smells like a post hoc ergo procter hoc or Chinese whisper??? If there is no causal connection between More and the executions, then of what value is that information. (Richard Rex's paper brings out the excellent point that More was involved in heresy appeals at the Star Chamber for the previous decade. What made his time as Lord Chancellor so special?)

The Lord Chancellor position was concerned with common law (civil law) that included misdemeanours like rioting, and equity, not criminal law; I gather than many case of heresy also involved aspects of the law proper to the Lord Chancellor (illegal book sales, rioting, sedition) so they were often funnelled through his office before any trial procedure. (Due to De heretico comburendo sedition and heresy were explicitly conflated in English law.)

But at the other end of the process, in the Lord Chancellor's role as presiding judge of court of the Star Chamber he only had one vote from 10 to 30 others (and the Star Chamber's voting was not recorded, so we don't know what he voted anyway). The Star Chamber could not impose the death penalty, and was a kind of Appeals court with better procedures than general courts. Crimes, like treason, and so on were handled by the King's Bench, not the Star Chamber.

The aggregate impression I am getting from the non-partisan academic sources is that the Star Chamber could hear appeals on heresy charges, and could commute a death penalty or allow it, but not impose it. 

Does anyone have any reliable source with better info for this, sometime near the 1520s?

For heresy charges, when someone was apprehended and charged, they first went through a (civil) discover process by the arresting authorities to determine whether there was enough evidence to initiate the process. Then they were handed over to the local bishop (who had his own prison accommodation, like the Lollard's Tower) for examination (the Bishops would have also presumably have been bound by the general rules of the (Roman) Inquisition in their procedures.) So the Bishop returned them to the secular authority with their finding: not a heretic, re-canted heretic, minor heretic, major heretic, or whatever. If the Bishop found them to be persistent or relapsed major heretics, then they were handed over to the secular authorities and XXX and then they were executed.

...It is that XXX where I find academic source articles unclear or variable. 

I would appreciate any pointers editors have: did they then get indicted by the secular authorities and tried, being able to appeal to the Star Chamber?   Or was the results of the Bishop's examination treated as a summary judgment not needing a further trial?  (My suspicion is that the former is true for capital cases, the later is true for non-capital cases where the person had abjured or only guilty of some minor infringement, like being illiterate and looking after the book for a friend without promoting its reading.) Did the bishops actually give the result of the examination with an expected or recommended punishment?


Thanks Rick Jelliffe (talk) 12:19, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Middle English

Many quotations by More are in such archaic language that they are incomprehensible to a speaker of modern English. They either need to be edited to have modern spellings or translated altogether. I have a BA in history, went to law school, and am presently employed as a writer. English is my first language. If I am struggling with these quotations, I know other people are as well. 2001:5B0:211B:F648:63AC:3F20:6C2B:3A21 (talk) 14:58, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

MOS:QUOTE requires " the quoted text must be faithfully reproduced." Which are the problem passages, please, to give us more of a handle on the problem? --AntientNestor (talk) 16:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
BTW, it is "modern English" as in "Early Modern English", not "Middle English".--AntientNestor (talk) 16:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
☒N I have looked at the five quotations from More, and all of them use modern spellings, though sometimes more capitals than most of us use now. I wonder which quotes are meant? (Maybe it is non-More quotes, such as the laws?)
The epitaph is poetry, so saying things by allusion and indirection is its essense not a flaw. The "my darling" paragraph may be odd when reading silently, but if reading it aloud it is perfectly clear IMHO. But most of the quotes are not quips but statements about subjects introduced in the article: for example royal "Supremacy" has no simple 21st century analog term.
Finally, yes Misplaced Pages helps people understand new things, but this is not only by providing facts but also by exposure to a wider vocabulary and language constructions that may not be idiomatic in some regions of e.g. the Anglosphere. But they need to be explained enough that people can grok. Rick Jelliffe (talk) 03:10, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
The "my darling" quote now has an explanatory footnote.--AntientNestor (talk) 17:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

An "amateur" theologian?

I was surprised that Thomas More's theological work is described as "amateur" in the opening paragraph (".. social philosopher, author, statesman, amateur theologian, and noted Renaissance humanist"). This may be technically correct, but it is not clear why his theological work is singled out as if there is some significant distinction between the amateur and professional theologians of the 16th century. Could the sentence be improved by leaving out "amateur"? Mnjuckes (talk) 22:45, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Agree. Apart from the point that that such a distinction seems incongruous for the period, many of his published works concern theology. AntientNestor (talk) 06:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: