Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hamedog (talk | contribs) at 23:33, 30 May 2007 (Leaving Misplaced Pages). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Note:If you post a message here, I will reply here. If I post a message on your talk page, don't reply here. I have your page in my watchlist. This keeps the conversation from breaking.

Archives

User talk:Hamedog/Archive 1: 23 November 2005 – 14 September 2006 User talk:Hamedog/Archive 2: 18 September 2006 - Current

Jellybeans

Here are some Jelly beans for you. I love jelly beans as they have sugar in them and most people love sugar. But on the other hand just receiving somthing from somone else just makes you happy and also just giving this to you makes me happy. I hope to spread the jelly beans all over Misplaced Pages, so here, you can have this lot. Please enjoy them. (I like the lime ones.)

Editors need a bit of a sugar high too.

An apple a day keeps -The Doctor- away. Or does it! 02:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

David Beckham

Chocolate

Hi, do you like whittakers chocolae?

2006 Tri Nations Series images

Hey, I was wondering if you could create two more of those starting line-up images for this article? I have added the starting line-ups, and replacements and everything to the article, and all that is needed are those images. Would be great if you could do this, thanks! - Shudda 00:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Okay, if I get time.--Hamedog_Talk| 06:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Wallabies

• Do you want to help me in order to better this article Wallabies (version française) ? It should be a very nice result... Ddfree 18:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

If I get time.--Hamedog_Talk| 22:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

2007 final

Hey, have started something here. - Shudda 03:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

RfA

Hey, thanks for the RfA nomination. I must decline however. I don't really have any need for the admin powers, and am quite happy contributing the way I am at the moment. I'm really flattered that you nominated me - so please don't be offended that I have declined. Thanks. - Shudda 01:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

No worries.--Hamedog_Talk| 07:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Warning

Hamdog Willkca has been warned that repeating the comments will result in a block please leave the issue alone, in short the comments were offensive statements about staff, student and parents of student at the school including names. Gnangarra 02:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I assume you deleted the edits? Yes, sorry about this I was curious as to what had happened, not trying to re-start the fire or anything. Was I mentioned?--Hamedog_Talk| 02:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

What was said was deleted, there is no need for further comments. If you have concerns raise it WP:AN/I. Gnangarra 03:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Wow, you make it sound like I have done something wrong.--Hamedog_Talk| 03:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:LIBEL is the official position of Misplaced Pages, please read it Gnangarra 03:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Also Slander_and_libel#Australian_law Gnangarra 03:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Come on- just stay off the issue or a more adventurous admin will block you on the spot, Stay out of the issue and dont leave anything on any page to do with the issue. Simple as that. SatuSuro 03:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I am aware of slander and libel but I don't think Australian Law applies in this situation as the offence technically occurs in Florida, coming under United States Law (as Misplaced Pages's servers are hosted there). On what grounds would I be blocked? As far as I am aware I have just made an inquirey into the events that occured on the talk page of an article I have made major contributions too (a mouthful!).--Hamedog_Talk| 03:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Having read Slander_and_libel#Australian_law, I take back some of the comments made earlier. But I have not made claims that could be regarded as libel (at least not recently :P)--Hamedog_Talk| 04:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

you asked about the willkca comments, They are why I have referred to those links, I have ask you to cease I'm now officially warning you that continuation of this is disruptive and are asking people to violate Australian law as that article link indicates. I am also requesting that you move this discussion to your current archive once you have read this message. Gnangarra 04:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I would suspect that anyone with knowledge of wikipedia policies - reviewing the situation can clearly state that any attempt to circulate or any way show knowledge of, or circulate the willkca comments back into circulation makes you party to the issue. Archive now, so you will not regret !SatuSuro 04:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I have this page set up so it is achived every 16 days. I don't believe I have done anything wrong, I just wanted to know what had occured on the Scotch College talk page, an article I have heavily contributed to. In no way am I trying to help anyone spread material that could be regarded by the courts as libel.

Just a small tip - there's an old saying "choose your battles", this is *really* not worth going down over in my opinion. The above people aren't taking personal issue with you, it's the job of an admin to watch out for this kind of stuff to ensure Wikimedia Foundation doesn't get sued. Orderinchaos 05:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't want to see WF getting sued either. I was simply trying to find out what occurred on the talk page of Scotch College, Perth, an article I worked on to get up to GA status. I am sure 95% of editors would also like to know what occurred on the talk page of an article they have made major contributions. I no way am I condoning or attempting to aid the spread of this material - the edits are deleted after all, but I was very interested in why such a fuss was thrown up by admin following these edits. I have not done a thing wrong so I will not archive now - this discussion is still active in my mind.--Hamedog_Talk| 01:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

You are your own undoing mate - you have what some police, ambulance and fire workers call it the I have to see the car crash/fire syndrome - long standing editors and admins have perused the talk page item and deemed it inappropriate - If you cannot hack that try worrying about something else. There is something wrong in wanting to resurrect or spark interest in an item that is no longer there - leave well alone. It has absolutely not one iota or anything to do with making wikipedia a better encyclopedia.SatuSuro 05:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry but I don't believe that I was trying to "spark interest" - as I have restated numerous times, I was curious as to why edits were deleted from the talk page of an article I have made major contributions to. It concerns me - I don't want to see WF get sued but I had genuine interest in what occured - both the Scotch article and user talk page were in my watchlist before the events. How long is long enough to be regarded as a long standing editor - I've been here for a year and a half and don't deem it inappropriate. Maybe this has dragged on for too long, maybe not, but much of it has revolved around me trying to defend myself and my actions. No, I was not spreading libel related material and I wasn't trying to restart a spread of libel; I wanted to have knowledge of what had occured. As a "kinda harsh" end note, some people call these kinds of actions the sign of a cabal. But thats just a conspiracy theory - or is it?--Hamedog_Talk| 07:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Archived

That discussion is now in your archive2, and should remain there. Willkca has already apologised for the comments so its finished with. Gnangarra 06:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I have reinstated it has I believe the discussion is still active. A bot will archive when the discussion becomes in active.--Hamedog_Talk| 07:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Gnangarra 00:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Hamedog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not regard my actions as trolling in any way. Firstly, I have not encourgaged others to break Australian law in any way. I was enquiring as to why an edit was deleted from the talk page of Scotch College, Perth, an article I have heavily contributed too. I made this enquiring on the user talk page of the user (Willkca) who made the deleted edits (his talk page was on my watchlist due to me creating that page). Following some warnings, which I felt were unnecessary, I contacted Willkca via email, who send me the deleted text. Gnangarra and Orderinchaos also contacted me via email with the latter also sending me the deleted text. On my talk page, other events, which you can see above, were occuring, with Gnangarra accusing me of requesting people, namely Willkca, to break Australian law - "are asking people to violate Australian law". At no stage, in my mind, was I doing this, I was enquiring into what events occured, which I was attempting to do the whole time. I do not support the spread of slander or libel (in this case as its written) and I don't want to see the Wikimedia Foundation getting sued either. As you can see above, the claimed trolling is me defending my actions against SatuSuro and Gnangarra with Orderinchaos offering some advice. I believe this block is totally unjust and would like to see Gnangarra side of the story or rebuttal. I would also like the actions of Gnangarra, an admin, to be reviewed. I would also like to note that I can not access my email at this time. Thank You.--HamedogTalk

Decline reason:

reason — No. You were warned, and you persisted. Please wait out your block. ⇒ SWATJester 08:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, in reply to Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Hamedog_--_Block, I can't find were I believe the comments may of been about myself unless it was in an email. At no point do I believe I have pushed the "Since then Hamedog has continued to push the I want to know its my right and every body elses to know the comment line". And besides, if I am being blocked under WP:LIBEL, then shouldn't this blocked be reverted as I am currently not blocked for breaking WP:LIBEL but for trolling? Also, my previous block wasn't for vandalism but was for "mis-using" WP:AIV under the belief my account was compromised.--Hamedog_Talk| 05:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

note this dif "was I mentioned?" and this reinstating the discussion on your talk page after inital request to remove it where declined stating the matter wasnt closed. Gnangarra 06:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Leaving Misplaced Pages

It appears I am not allowed to leave Misplaced Pages via an IP address (see revert on my user page by User:Pilotguy and the block of the IP address 202.135.64.225).--Hamedog_Talk|