Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Joy (talk | contribs) at 18:21, 17 October 2003. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I doubt Germany and the EU formally allow Montenegro to use Euro as an official curency

• currency: euro - even though Montenegro is not part of the Eurozone, it uses the euro after Germany and the EU allowed it to use the German mark years ago. Now, since the German mark was superceded by the euro, the euro is the official currency of Montenegro.

What is "calques"? -- Zoe

"calque" is a loan translation, an expression introduced into one language by translating it from another language. (from Wordnet dictionary) --Shallot 14:20, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Some Montenegrins have in recent years shown a desire to separate Montenegro from the federation with jist of the separatist movement being among the Slavic Muslim and Albanian minorities who make up some 20% of the population -- what does this sentence mean? -- Zoe

I don't know, but it seems to make some kind of sense if you assume "jist" is a typo for "most"... -- Paul A

In recent years, some Montenegrins have shown a desire to separate from the Yugoslavian/Balkan/Serbian(?) Federation. The separatist movement consists mainly of Slavic Muslim and Albanian minorities, which consist of 20% of the Montenegrin population. --More sense?

I should make note that Igor's edits spin the article towards the Serbian point of view, which is in conflict with the Montenegro government and hence the majority of voting population, contrary to what it may imply. The article needs to be made more neutral. --Shallot 14:20, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)

I do not partake in such practices, there has been no reversal of power in Montenegro since 1945, the very party that held the media, government and police prior to any given election won it. There have been widespread reports of vote fraud and besides, the government won some 47% at the last elections, hardly an indisputable majority.

Regards, --Igor 3:22, 29 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Aww, you seem to be losing your touch, this is one of the retorts that makes the least sense. --Shallot 16:44, 29 Sep 2003 (UTC)

--- Parts of this page are extremely, um misleading. The idea of Montenegrin 'ethnicity' is totally modern, not even appearing before Serbia's (Raskian Serbia that is) independence from the Ottoman empire in the 20TH CENTURY. If your talking about free countries in history, Montenegrins for generations WERE the Serbs. Just making some sweeping comments that assume historical "Montenegrins" (which is what happens when you start off sentences w "Ethnic Montenegrins...."), well its playing w facts.

Also your comments on language are just totally off-base, lies in fact. The major dialectal isoglosses of Serbo-Croat, EACH ONE of them in fact spreads geographically through Croatia, Bosnia-Hercegovina, AND Serbia. You give the impression that some special speech form local to montenegro is also the speech of Bosnia. No, Bosnian speech varies by location, but of course accents and well 'localisms', do converge at the Bosnian/Montenegrin border, the same is true in any country for almost any small areas next to each other.

Anyway, the article as written is some "thinly veiled" sort of pro-secessionist propaganda sheet. I wish people would stop writing articles for subjects they have no special knowledge of or in cases where they have no objectivity.

tridesch

I'm not particularly inclined to bother discerning what's meant by trashing their ethnicity as modern while the page says exactly the same, and replicates the percentages exactly as on the census. Your notion of each of the dialects being in each region is patent nonsense as it's štokavian that is everywhere, not the other three (unless you mean dialects of štokavian, which would be a really slippery slope). It's also very amusing to see you characterize a page last edited by user Igor as pro-secessionist propaganda. Keep it up :> --Shallot 18:21, 17 Oct 2003 (UTC)