Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Finns (talk | contribs) at 17:33, 7 December 2007 (→Wiki Cup: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Thank you for popping by to my talk page. If you'd like to leave a message, please do so at the bottom of this page, and don't forget to sign your post using four tildes (~~~~) so I can get back to you with a reply. Cheers! The Rambling Man

Archives

no archives yet (create)

Two posibilities

I am ready to go for broke with the stronger of the two, what do I do now, please see:
User:Secisek/Sandbox -- SECisek (talk) 00:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Done. -- SECisek (talk) 17:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism?

Hey, I'm just curious do you have any idea of why this user left a note claiming you were vandalizing some articles on my talk page? I'm somewhat skeptic about the vandalism allegation but I would like to see the whole picture to see if I can do something to resolve the matter without it escalating further. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I see, any idea of what edits he was talking about? its hard to discern what he meant as a result of his "Povish" almost fanatical attitude, I presume its just his way of luring me in but it may be good to keep an eye on any article that a new sock may edit. - Caribbean~H.Q. 14:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

That is good to hear, she is a checkuser so I guess that any suspicious user will probably be checked if deemed nesesary. - Caribbean~H.Q. —Preceding comment was added at 14:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Birmingham City F.C. GA nominee

Hi, Thanks again for the helpful suggestions you made on Birmingham City F.C.'s talk page, which have been dealt with as best I can. I've put this up for GA now, and was wondering if you might find time to review it? Though if you've already got too much to do before your holiday (or if I'm not supposed to ask a specific editor to review? I don't know the conventions) I'll understand entirely. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for getting on to this so quickly. I've made some changes to the article following your review, and replied to each of your points at the talk page. Whenever you're ready to have another look at it... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Re edit to strip colours, it was someone trying to correct the colour of socks which must have been wrong for some significant period of time. An error which, despite it saying blue socks quite clearly in the Colours section, erm, no-one working on the article noticed. Not sure I can convincingly blame my colour-blindness for that one. Oops! cheers, Struway2 (talk) 18:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the promotion and for your kind words re proceeding to FAC. That'll have to wait - just at the moment I don't even want to see the thing again, let alone fiddle with it at the request of peer reviewers or scary FA assessors. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Hartsdown Park

Thank you kindly good sir :-) ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Faroe stamp love

Maybe i forgot to erase his signature and put mine, sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vatomanocu (talk • contribs) 13:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

That was a model of good faith admin work. Well done, TRM. And by the way, you got mail. --Dweller (talk) 16:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

From Melaniesharrison (talk · contribs)

Hi Rambling man, I'm sorry if I'm putting this in the wrong place. Thanks for your help & advice- much more helpful than some of the comments I have received. Yes, as in a law court, I can see that the 'well someone else got away with it, why can't I?' approach is not very helpful, so I apologise for that. I would be extremely grateful if you could restore the article to my user page or whatever you called it so that I can try to work on it, although I am worried that the decision is being made to blacklist me and the company as I write this. I will certainly spend a lot more time thinking & reading before I ever submit anything again. Is there any way I can get someone on here to read/vet the article before I properly post it? Kind regards Melaniesharrison (talk) 16:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the birthday wishes. :) Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

A stamp from real me

Here's a stamp from the Faroe Islands for you! Stamps from the Faroe Islands somehow promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! Húsönd 17:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Kinkladze

Been hit with a salvo of real-life busyness so I've been slow off the mark. I stand firmly by "calamitous defending including a freak own goal" though, see Exhibit A. Oldelpaso (talk) 20:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Strong opposes on certain candidates

Is this an example of what you hope to avoid regarding unnecessary strong opposes? Acalamari 22:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I dislike opposition like that too. I actually feel sorry for these users who sign up, create an RfA in good-faith, and then feel like they've done something wrong when the RfA tough-brigade comes out in force. Fortunately, that user is still active now, so they weren't chased off the project. Acalamari 22:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Wiki Cup

Congratulations, you have finished 3rd in the WikiCup after walking over Davnel03, his fault really coz he didn't tell us he changed his name, sure you couldn't care less though, anyway I'm babbling, and for your achievement, I award you the Bronze Wiki Award. F9T 17:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC)