This is an old revision of this page, as edited by -asx- (talk | contribs) at 18:51, 11 July 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:51, 11 July 2005 by -asx- (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)NPOV?
Surely a person who is so prominent in politics would have critics of some kind? :) 172.197.198.105 04:39, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Mention Jewish Heritage?
Franken is jewish... Should that maybe be mentioned in the article, or is that irrelevant? --Konstantin 5 July 2005 22:13 (UTC)
Al Franken Show and Guests
Michael Medved once stated that he asked Franken why he's never been invited on The Al Franken Show and was told the show didn't have guests, yet I know numerous liberals have been guests on the show (Bill Moyers being one of the more prominent names I can think of). What's the real deal regarding guests on The Al Franken Show?
- Cryptico 10 July 2005
- Franken has interviewed a number of conservatives, too, so whatever the issue with Medved, it's not because of a blanket refusal to interview conservatives. -asx- 05:00, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
POV Push?
In my opinion, it is not necessary to say, "When the original goal failed to materialize and Bush was re-elected, Franken expressed his deep disappointment and signed on with Air America for another two years." It is more neutral and succinct to simply say, "When Bush was re-elected, Franken signed on with Air America for another two years." Franken's disappointment with the election results is already obvious and is irrelevent in this sentence. Is someone reveling in Franken's disappointment? Is that the reason for including it? To my mind, including it is akin to saying, "Ha! You LOST!" -asx- 05:18, 11 July 2005 (UTC)