Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Newbyguesses (talk | contribs) at 02:14, 17 February 2008 (lorem ipsum). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

drafty drafty--

from Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/Cla68

Particularly in Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/Cla68#Unsupported claims, it is striking that User:SlimVirgin is politely asked to stop making unsupported allegations, amounting to a personal attack on User:Cla68, and yet SV does not ackowledge that these attacks should cease, and continues blithely to repeat them. No evidence appears ever to have been furnished to support these allegations.

(Specifically 1. That Cla68 had posted somewhere on some attack site

2. that Cla68 lives in the same state as Wordbomb)

These, and other insinuations which were raised at Cla68's RFA can only have had an unjustified detrimental effect on that RFA.

No user other than SV makes these allegations, and no user can be convinced without evidence of the validity of these unsupported assertions made by SV.

So SV is certainly "guilty" of stubbornness, and of "poor judgement", if not of failing to assume, and exhibit, good faith WP:AGF applies.

Here SV vows to continue making personal attacks, after being asked not to, and refuses to support those allegations by making evidence available to all rightly-concerned parties.

from Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/Cla68

I didn't expect you to out him. What I'd rather you did was quit making the accusations. Mangoe 19:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Well then I'm sorry that, once again, I have to disappoint you. :-) It's clearly relevant, in an RfC that discusses someone's apparent support for a notorious banned user, that one of the few endorsements of that persons' account comes from a close associate of the banned user. It's also appropriate to offer the evidence to admins by e-mail given that it involves what appears to be someone's real name. SlimVirgin 19:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Has SlimVirgin made good at any time on this offer to make this alleged evidence available by email to any Admin, and thus allow some scrutiny to take place as to the propriety of these Admin actions, and harassment of Cla68?

SlimVirgin makes unsupported allegations against User:Cla68

diff where SV makes an unsupported allegation

request to stop making unsupported allegations

SV replies

Has SV ever made good on this offer?

One of the problems that besets all of this is the way in which it seems to have become 
acceptable to make claims about other people without evidence (Mangoe.)

Has SlimVirgin made good at any time on this offer to make this alleged evidence available by email to any Admin, and thus allow some proper scrutiny to take place as to the propriety of these Admin actions, and harassment of Cla68?