This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mr.Z-man (talk | contribs) at 20:06, 20 April 2008 (→BAG membership on RfA?: no). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:06, 20 April 2008 by Mr.Z-man (talk | contribs) (→BAG membership on RfA?: no)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)BAG membership on RfA?
Currently, there is a trial on application of BAG membership being put forth in the same manner as Requests for Adminship. Do you think this step is in the correct direction?
Yes
No
- I hate it. The bot approval group is something that doesn't really concern many users, and something not many people know anything about. I can't understand the benefit of adding it to the (already very long) RfA page. J Milburn (talk) 20:01, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- No, BAG needs abolishing. Majorly (talk) 20:00, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- No. BAG should be selected based on technical knowledge. The community at large is not qualified to make such decisions. seresin ( ¡? ) 20:04, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- RFA is a bureaucratic mess beaten only by ArbCom. How BAG membership jumped from a tiny discussion to RFA, I still don't know. Mr.Z-man 20:06, 20 April 2008 (UTC)