This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zagalejo (talk | contribs) at 01:00, 22 May 2008 (re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:00, 22 May 2008 by Zagalejo (talk | contribs) (re)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome
- Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete unsourced oneliner about a rare genetic disorder without any claim to notability or even context on what is disordered or how it is manifest. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm responsible for the unsourced oneliner. I apologize. I'm neither sufficiently versed in the aspects of the disease or Misplaced Pages to create a worthwhile page. Thank you to the contributors that have improved the stub. As I noted in the original discussion page it was redirecting to another unrelated condition of a similar name. 167.73.110.8 (talk) 19:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Mr.KnowNothingGuy
- No need to apologize. It was a good-faith contribution. Zagalejo^^^ 01:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep a quick Google reveals plenty of sources, so I'm sure it could be expanded into a worthwhile article (though I'm not qualified to do so). 82.1.57.47 (talk) 18:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Here's an explanation of what it is. And there's plenty of more detailed information here. Couldn't you have just gone to a WikiProject for help? Zagalejo^^^ 18:25, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- This seems to be a somewhat more accessible explanation. Zagalejo^^^ 18:33, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- If you think it worth saving, please improve the article from its horrible condition. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- This is hardly my area of expertise. I don't want to be responsible for adding misleading medical information. It's not "horrible", though. It's a stub. They're allowed. I see you've made similar articles, like Matelot, Trinidad. Zagalejo^^^ 18:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Nice redlink asking to be made; settlements are inherently notable notwithstanding someone tagging it for speedy deletion. Genetic disorders are not inherently notable. Huge distinction, dude. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Why wouldn't genetic disorders be inherently notable? Zagalejo^^^ 01:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 20:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep It's a stub for a verifiable disease - Misplaced Pages should encourage people to add information - that's what stubs are for! No reason to delete. Stephenb (Talk) 20:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - plenty of reliable sources out there to demonstrate notability. Just needs expansion by someone with that kind of knowledge. (AFD is not cleanup...)--BelovedFreak 20:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - I'd have thought that any disease that has been documented in medical literature would qualify as notable, no matter how rare. Vquex (talk) 21:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Legitimate medical topic. Needs expansion by an expert on the subject. KleenupKrew (talk) 21:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per the above, a legitimate medical topic with substantial sources available. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 22:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per references and real world notability. Consistent with a specialized encyclopedia on medical conditions. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 02:04, 21 May 2008 (UTC)