This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Enigmaman (talk | contribs) at 20:30, 23 June 2008 (reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:30, 23 June 2008 by Enigmaman (talk | contribs) (reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| Please leave a new message. |
 Archives |
If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. The same applies to you. If I leave a message on your page, I keep it watchlisted and I'll see when you reply.
BLP violations
I have deleted the content you added to User:Enigmaman/Sandbox that was re-deleted per BLP1E, please do not recreate it in the future. MBisanz 07:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- What was the violation? Non Curat Lex (talk) 08:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Has to do with this and this. Enigma 14:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- What strangeness. Why did you repost it in your sandbox? Non Curat Lex (talk) 23:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't realize it was going to be a problem. The talk of the deleted page was where a user was working on a copy to improve it to Misplaced Pages standards. It got deleted due to the "talk page of a deleted page" clause. I thought it was a worthy endeavor to improve the article, as there's no question that the subject has received coverage from reliable sources, thus meeting WP:N. Enigma 23:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Award Center Newsletter
Misplaced Pages:AWC/newsletter/archive/4 - Newsletter Bot Talk 02:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC) If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here.
Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For your improvements to Brian Stewart, I, Sharkface217, hereby award you this barnstar. Thanks for all the hard work with ACCOTF. --Sharkface/C 02:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC) |
Keep an eye on this one...
Hey E_man. Do me a favour. Keep an eye on uber-edit-warrior User:Johan Rachmaninov. It doesn't matter how many people edit the pages he wants to own he reverts them. I discussed his case with Pat the other day but I decided to AGF him for dozens of 3RR vios. I am not going to AGF anymore. I you catch him reverting anything from anybody on a page that he's reverted on, even once, in the past 2 days... let me know and I'll put him on the chop. Libs (talk) 16:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
WP:LA
Hi - Unless I do something special, 52pickup will be readded to the active list until his (her) last 30 edits are within the last 3 months (mid July I suppose). I suppose it's pretty clear when editors stop editing completely that they're gone but the active/semi-active/inactive algorithm doesn't really take this into account. I think I'd like to keep "inactive" as "no edits in the last three months", but I suppose there could be a "no edit in the last " criteria for semi-active. Any suggestions for n? -- Rick Block (talk) 02:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that there should be a criterion added that would shift an admin from active to semi-active once they haven't edited for n days. I'm no expert, but I would say 30 days for sure, possibly less. Enigma 02:53, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Independent Democratic Confederation of Nepalese Trade Union
I'll take a look and see if I can find any more sources. The article does look a lot better than it did before you cleaned it up nicely. Useight (talk) 18:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
My RFA (plyhmrp)
Why did you take off my RFA and are you a admin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plyhmrp (talk • contribs) 20:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not an admin and I closed it due to WP:NOTNOW and WP:SNOW. It had no chance of passing. I would elaborate, but I'd rather not. Enigma 20:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
First off tell me why you edited my userpage in the guidelines section and how can you judge if it will pass. Another policy WP:SNOW is not a policy it says so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plyhmrp (talk • contribs) 20:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- I removed personal attacks from your talk page. They are inappropriate. Please read WP:SNOW and WP:NOTNOW. I am positive your RfA would not have passed. I would not have closed it had I had any doubt. Enigma 20:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
First those "attacks" are on MY userpage so I can do what I wish. Don't take down RFA'S it's not your job.Plyhmrp (talk) 20:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)plyhmrp
- You cannot attack other users anywhere, whether it's on your talk page or not. Enigma 20:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)