Misplaced Pages

Talk:Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea case

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AndriyK (talk | contribs) at 15:28, 5 February 2009 (Created page with '==80% of area does not mean 80% of oil and gas reserves == Indeed, EUobserver states that ''The verdict - which cannot be appealed - means Romania can exploit 80 p...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:28, 5 February 2009 by AndriyK (talk | contribs) (Created page with '==80% of area does not mean 80% of oil and gas reserves == Indeed, EUobserver states that ''The verdict - which cannot be appealed - means Romania can exploit 80 p...')(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

80% of area does not mean 80% of oil and gas reserves

Indeed, EUobserver states that The verdict - which cannot be appealed - means Romania can exploit 80 percent of the 100 billion cubic metres of gas and 15 million tonnes of crude oil in the disputed zone, leaving the rest to Ukraine. But it would be correct if the reserves are evenly distributed over the area. There is no evidence that this is the case. If a journalist from EUobserver made a mistake or unjustified assertion, it is not a reason to repeat it here. We have to use common sence while editing articles.--AndriyK (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)