This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MBisanz (talk | contribs) at 22:17, 28 February 2009 (Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Secure USB drive closed as keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:17, 28 February 2009 by MBisanz (talk | contribs) (Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Secure USB drive closed as keep)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This article was nominated for deletion on 23 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Computing Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Cleanup
I placed a similar comment on User Talk:Techdoctor as well. Secure USB flash drives seem to be an interesting topic. However, as someone else already remarked, it reads like an essay or magazine article where the author tries to provide arguments to convince the reader. Maybe these arguments are from publications. There are a number of references, but it is not clear which reference makes what argument, and which arguments are your own opinion. The easiest way to deal with it is to use something like
<ref></ref>
directly after each statement, and
{{reflist}}
at the end of the article. Moreover, the article should start with a short definition of what a secure USB drive is, rather than with an argument, and this short definition can be worked out later in the article. - Han-Kwang (t) 08:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Categories: