Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rjd0060 (talk | contribs) at 19:29, 7 April 2009 (→RE: User talk:BetacommandBot: +com). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Enigma is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages on April 16, 2009 but only after visiting parts unknown

Archives

Pre-March March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 Nov/December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009

If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. The same applies to you. If I leave a message on your page, I keep it watchlisted and I'll see when you reply. If you cannot be polite when typing your message here, please do not click Save page. Thank you.

Liam Gallagher

Flag your minor edits as minor, mate :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrhadam (talk • contribs) 22:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't know what you're talking about either. Enigma 02:00, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Enigmaaaa!

Replied on my talk page ;) Ariel♥Gold 02:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

		The BLP Barnstar
		And here it is! Thank you for all your work helping to keep articles in line with the WP:BLP! Ariel♥Gold 05:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Added the two current biography-related barnstars to the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Biography page. :) Ariel♥Gold 06:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

there is nothing wrong with what i added to the Wandy Rodriguez page. Besides, i only added the last paragraph. The other stuff was put there by someone else. The last paragraph is relevant to his current situation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobizzle (talk • contribs) 22:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Wandy Rodriguez NEVER had cited info. Maybe you should hammer the other people who edited it before me. Bobizzle (talk) 22:45, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Travel ping sent

--VS 01:52, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

T-Y

Cheers for the reversion you did on my userpage. Good Ol’factory 08:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Au revoir for now. Enigma 16:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: User talk:BetacommandBot

The information contained in that header is valuable for anybody with questions with regards to copyright information. I find it quite helpful. Users who think it is productive go go around making such edits as tagging pages as "banned" are another issue, but there is nothing I can do to help such users. I don't really think the info is bitey though. Also, looking at the history, I don't think we have to be concerned with many people posting questions there. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:04, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

I understand and for the most part agree. I just don't think that is bitey. It is clear and concise, to the point, but copyright can be a confusing area and being blunt sometimes is the best way to explain things. Unless I've missed something specific there, I honestly don't see the concern. Regards, - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, I won't be reverting - I just don't see the need to remove all of the information, and plaster the "BANNED" notice at the top. I missed #11 there when I was reading it. Perhaps the other items can be rewritten a bit. I don't mean to put you off of doing it, as it is certainly not my page. To reiterate, my only concern was the removal of all of the information and the notice. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)