This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vanished user 5zariu3jisj0j4irj (talk | contribs) at 14:16, 9 May 2009 (→Barnstar). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:16, 9 May 2009 by Vanished user 5zariu3jisj0j4irj (talk | contribs) (→Barnstar)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Click here to leave me a messageAwards and articles I created. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard/RfA_Report
Best welcome template: User:AxG/WikiWelcome1 wikipediareview: History of wikipedia |
A shiny barnstar!
What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar | ||
For your elegant and clear solution to some vexing situations I hereby award you this shiny barnstar you can play catch with or trade for superpowers or even put on a display shelf for all to behold and admire. The Article Rescue Squadron is a band of troupers who work in stressful environments to save content worth keeping and your help is very much appreciated. -- Banjeboi 11:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC) |
Progress
User_talk:PhilKnight#Sussing_forward_motion_at_ARS, no promises but we may have some promising ideas on the horizon. -- Banjeboi 18:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Straw poll for ARS
This is the work area for a straw poll for the WP:Article Rescue Squadron, it is treated as a userpage, as per WP:User page: "In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing another's user page without their permission." I have invited a half dozen editors to edit and build this section.
Can Article Rescue Squadron behave like all other wikiprojectsMisplaced Pages editors in other wikiprojects are pretty much free to post whatever links they want, this includes deletion reviews, articles for deletion, etc. should Article Rescue Squadron be able to also? Precendence
Template
|
- Isn't the issue more that the posts should be neutral so canvassing concerns are moot? -- Banjeboi 04:15, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar | ||
This is an excellent idea for Foreign relations of Argentina by country to deal with the minor bilateral relationships, just 1 suggestion for improvement can we sort by continent/region? LibStar (talk) 09:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC) |
- First of all, thank you so much for the barnstar, it was unexpecedt and very appreciated.
- We are acutally thinking of making it into one big graph, we can include a continent region, and make is searchable. See: Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force for our discussion. Ikip (talk) 09:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
ARS
See, this is where you need to be careful if you don't want to stir up more drama than you need to. The project as it stands is on fairly strong ground; improving and referencing articles can't really be challenged.
Inviting masses of inclusionists (on that basis), however, isn't really a good look. They might well be people who would be interest, but it looks like you're just trying to stack votes; this sort of partisan stuff goes down badly on Misplaced Pages, and leads to drama pretty much every time. It might have grown the group significantly, but it's also dragged it into controversy, and not just because of its numbers.
If you're going to involve yourself in deletion issues, you'll really save yourself a lot of stress if you think a bit about how things might be received. Like I said, if you stick to just improving articles at risk of deletion, and using the project to improve such, then you can't go wrong. The more you drag it into broader inclusion-deletion wars, the more drama you're going to create for yourself and the project. Rebecca (talk) 14:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)