Misplaced Pages

User talk:PirateSmackK

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PirateSmackK (talk | contribs) at 16:54, 31 May 2009 (Joke). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:54, 31 May 2009 by PirateSmackK (talk | contribs) (Joke)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User talk:PirateSmackK/Header

This is PirateSmackK's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.


Joke

The MakeSysop edit was meant to be joke I didn't realize it would be taken that seriosly I'm sorry PirateSmackK 16:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Great, I'll add "lying" to your list of "shit he's done wrong that means AGF no longer applies" shall I? I stopped you from being blocked in an attempt to make a decent contributor out of someone - to have it thrown back in my face like this is infuriating. Ironholds (talk) 16:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm not lying it was really meant to be a joke.. PirateSmackK 16:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Oh no, I'm not referring to that. When it was first brought up you claimed it was quote "an accident". I stopped you from being blocked when you were pissing around. The idea of a second chance is "a second chance to get things right" not "a second chance to piss around again". Ironholds (talk) 16:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm not pissing around I do have mostly good edits, just tried to have a little fun.. :'( I thought its understood that it was a joke when it was first bought up on your talk page so I replied like that ("typo etc") --PirateSmackK 16:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  • No, it wasn't understood as a joke. You're under mentoring and editing supervision precisely because you were pissing around and "trying to have a little fun". The terms of you not being blocked were that you would cease such behavior - you have not. Please explain in what dimension tricking a 'crat into giving you admin tools is considered "a little fun" rather than "potentially highly disruptive to the wiki during the period a new, under-supervision user who was almost blocked has admin tools"? Ironholds (talk) 16:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
I went a bit too far with that one I know :'( PirateSmackK 16:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)