Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gu1dry (talk | contribs) at 01:57, 18 September 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Gu1dry. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hangon templates

Please note that the {{hangon}} template should not be used on articles tagged for proposed deletion – only those that have been nominated for speedy deletion. The M.A.D. EP is not nominated for speedy deletion, and so should not have the hangon template. I made a brief note of this in my edit summary here. I will now remove the template from the page. Also, please do not type in capital letters – it's the equivalent to shouting. Cheers, Fribbulus Xax (talk) 17:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: RFCBot Jr.

Heh, it seems my edits were quickly overwritten, but I thought life should go on even if the bot was taking a break. When the light goes out, you dig out the candles... Reminds me what a good thing it is to have the bot around for performing the mechanical edits, though :P Jafeluv (talk) 19:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

September, 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Validbanks 34 (talk) 18:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Careful

Somehow, you left tags on User talk:Validbanks 34 stating they were blocked. They are not blocked, and you are unable to block people. I didn't evaluate how bad whatever they did was - merely that you gave them false information on their user talk page. Please don't tell users they are blocked until they actually are blocked. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Whatever, I thought I could post a block tag on their page & they would be temp blocked until a admin reviewed it. 『 ɠu¹ɖяy 』  19:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Now you know, and knowing is half the battle! Hipocrite (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Please don't let Dave and Validbanks dissuade you. You were just not aware of how things worked. Validbanks 34 will be dealt with - if the disruption continues, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 20:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

However, please don't edit war. After he reverted you, you should not re-revert - instead, take discussions to the talk page, regardless of how right you might be. Hipocrite (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Seriously, you did use the wrong template. I suggest that you bookmark Misplaced Pages:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace and Category:Standardised_user_warning_templates. Next time you want to warn a user you will find quickly the correct template. Be sure to escalate correctly, starting with level 1 templates, specially for new users who might not know what rule they are breaking, since the level 1 gives a short explanation and links to relevant pages. --Enric Naval (talk) 20:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

I know about WP:WARN, I just jump a few rungs on the ladder, because it lists the block tags on the page, making think anyone can use them. I didn't not notice the Admin use only, due to my extreme frustration with the situation. I do not need you to patronizing me. I have already spoken to Hipocrite about this & I do not wish to speak about the subject anymore. 『 ɠu¹ɖяy 』  20:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Template:Z10

Gu1dry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not edit warring, I was revert vandalism caused by Validbanks 34

Decline reason:

It was not obvious vandalism, so yes, you were edit warring. An edit you disagree with is not vandalism. –Juliancolton |  23:46, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Flyff

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

A tag has been placed on Flyff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Misplaced Pages guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 20:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC)