This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 16:04, 22 October 2009 (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 9d) to User talk:Rjd0060/Archive 9.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:04, 22 October 2009 by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 9d) to User talk:Rjd0060/Archive 9.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
I will usually reply to messages left here on this page so check back for a response.
 Archives
|
Not sure which license applies
Hey, I wanted to ask you under which copyright status I could upload this image: http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/7571/danilovicstamatovicgoranovicjo.gif
It is an USA official document but as you can see, it dates back over 100 years. So is this picture public domain since it copyright status expired? Or should I upload it under US government copyright? Rave92 12:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Chugworth Academy Deletion
"A small web comic with no significance" seems pretty harsh, considering that at its height it received 50,000 unique hits a day and a nationally licensed book from a legit publisher. http://us.macmillan.com/chugworthacademyvol1 http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/chugworth.com
Just check its max trends, it remained in Alexa's top 100,000 for the portion of its lifespan while it did update.
Now admittedly, the comic has been in remission, but it seems like the proposed deletion was right before it started up with new updates, and so no one was paying attention to the article, but lacking in updates is not uncommon to web comics. It seems at the very least that the grounds for deletion are erroneous, as the comic had quite a large reader base and some significance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.2.228.8 (talk) 22:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Close to Home (Song)
Can you move Close to Home (Song) to User:Sheled Umlal/Close to Home so that I may work on it? —Preceding undated comment added 19:26, 11 October 2009 (UTC).
Eric Violette
This article is one you salted a little over a year ago -- would you consider removing the protection? (The subject is the guy who plays the pirate in the FreeCreditReport.com commercials.) I'm not sure about notability -- it's a singing pirate, after all -- but since the article was salted (and since the last deletion review) there have been reliable sources reporting on the subject. (See ). It may be worth opening it up to see if anyone writes a usable article.
My primary concern is that if we leave something salted that long, a subject that was not notable under the guidelines can become notable -- but we won't get an article about it because rank and file editors won't be interested in navigating deletion review or unprotection. Unless we really need to leave this salted to avoid disruption, I think we should try to open it up to see whether the subject has become notable. Thoughts? --TheOtherBob 16:30, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. --TheOtherBob 21:22, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Check mail. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:28, 21 October 2009 (UTC)