This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Stifle (talk | contribs) at 20:50, 26 January 2009 (Notification: Deletion of File:Miwyvideo.jpg. using TW). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:50, 26 January 2009 by Stifle (talk | contribs) (Notification: Deletion of File:Miwyvideo.jpg. using TW)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).KM*hearts*MC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please see User talk:Dancefloor royalty for explanation. Again, I am posting here this so that everyone is aware. I admit that I opened both dancefloor_royalty and KM*hearts*MC to agree in discussions and edits of User: Alkclark as I assume he was a friend of mind, which was not the case. This was all for my personal amusement and I feel that he/she should not punished for this.
Decline reason:
No need to request unblock from all of your sockpuppets; one will do. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sock case and checkuser results
See WP:Suspected sock puppets/Alkclark and WP:Requests for checkuser/Case/Alkclark, which confirmed all the socks. I commented on the SSP and opened the CU request, so I'm not answering this request for unblock myself. In my opinion, it is hard to argue with the checkuser evidence. EdJohnston (talk) 05:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Miwyvideo.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Miwyvideo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 20:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)