This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lysy (talk | contribs) at 01:00, 5 January 2006 (→I'm Lost). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:00, 5 January 2006 by Lysy (talk | contribs) (→I'm Lost)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Archive
Protection
Protected the article. Please work it out through dispute resolution if necessary. --Woohookitty 13:51, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
I'm Lost
I looked at all the changes trying to understand what happened but I was not able to keep track of all the changes and reverts. However, Node's edits appear particularly disquieting. He labeled them as "minor", however they were anything but that. He removed entire paragraphs (only retaining some sentences in each). Subsequent changes are simply cofusing. Most were only partial and so were the reverts, which makes understanding them extremely difficult. In any case, I suggest going back to the last version before Node and then the valid latter changes can be re-inserted. TSO1D 20:28, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't label them as minor. I said I was disentangling copyvio (which I did, and which you have now re-inserted), *as well as* making minor changes. --Node 00:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, and, you guys have consistently removed a valid Interwiki link. That qualifies as vandalism, no questions asked. --Node 00:27, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Node, I do not intend to sound patronizing or something, but it would be helpful for the dispute if wou were more specific, ideally provide a diff of the edit you're refering to. Otherwise I've no idea what ar you talking about. --Wojsyl 01:00, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Looking at this diff, I believe that the current version is pretty close to the one before Node's and further confusing edits. I've requested the article to be protected until a consensus on its contents is reached, as the recent edits had been overwhelmingly confusing. I'd suggest that we start looking at it section by section, as below. --Wojsyl 20:40, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- You are right, not too many significant changes exist between the two versions. I believe that the phrase: "and requiring proficiency in the Moldovan language for public servants" should be re-inserted, as well as this: " In the security zone controlled by the Russian peacekeeping forces, the MRT regime continued to deploy its troops illegally and to manufacture and sell weapons in breach of the agreement of 21 July 1992. In February 2003, the USA and EU imposed visa restrictions against the Transnistrian leadership." The other changes are negligible. TSO1D 22:37, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- Let's wait and see what the others think. We need to slow down here a bit ... --Wojsyl 22:59, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
NPOVing
Now, that the page is protected, can we discuss what's bothering whom, section by section ? --Wojsyl 13:53, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Content dispute
- Only content dispute in this section, please
The lead
- Firstly, is the lead all right ? --Wojsyl 13:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Names
- What about the "Names" section ?
Personal comments and other rants
- Please do not use this section for content dispute