This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dapi89 (talk | contribs) at 20:37, 23 January 2010 (→STOP NOW). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:37, 23 January 2010 by Dapi89 (talk | contribs) (→STOP NOW)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
Peace and happiness to all Steel2009 (talk) 18:52, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
For the last time
You have been reverted more than once on the Battle of Kursk page. Do it again and I will leave a message on the incident board which may result in a block or page ban. Stop your disruption. Dapi89 (talk) 15:49, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
And another thing: sockpuppeting is not acceptable. Dapi89 (talk) 15:51, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Just because I forgot to sign-in does not make me a sockpuppet. Steel2009 (talk) 17:28, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, right. Given you are incapable of common sense, and because of your bizarre, illogical and disruptive behavour on the Kursk article, you have been reported to the incidence board. Dapi89 (talk) 21:40, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
ANI notice
Hello, Steel2009. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GiantSnowman 21:59, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
ANI
I've deleted your baiting post. Don't leave any messages on my talk page again. You are not welcome there. Dapi89 (talk) 14:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Reply to thanks
No thanks needed; unfortunately I didn't seem to achieve much. Cheers Minorhistorian (talk) 10:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
STOP NOW
Stop adding citation needed tags to information that is already sourced. Dapi89 (talk) 17:16, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Stop adding provocative title headings. It is disruptive. You and You alone are the trouble maker here. Dapi89 (talk) 23:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- You know damn well what: this. Do you honestly think this encourages a workable atmosphere? By posting it, you become disruptive. Dapi89 (talk) 13:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Don't threaten, its Childish and absurd under the circumstances - as the arbiters there will no doubt see. Again.Dapi89 (talk) 20:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Stop adding provocative title headings. It is disruptive. You and You alone are the trouble maker here. Dapi89 (talk) 23:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC)