This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalcolmMcDonald (talk | contribs) at 19:52, 26 January 2010 (→Please don't leave). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:52, 26 January 2010 by MalcolmMcDonald (talk | contribs) (→Please don't leave)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hello, Spoonkymonkey, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Sunny910910 01:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- No problem, I hope you find what you need.--Sunny910910 01:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Just so you know, User:Compwhizii has helped format your page.--Sunny910910 01:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Thomas Shoyama has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Compwhiz II(Contribs) 01:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
The above comment is quite inaccurate and unfair. I started and wrote the Shoyama entry and asked for help on formatting. I did receive the help, for which I am grateful. Spoonkymonkey (talk) 01:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- I beleive it was proabably because comments like that should be asked on the talkpage as it disrupts the article.--Sunny910910 01:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
There wouldn't be an article if I hadn't written one. I doubt this is a good way to attract talent to Misplaced Pages. Spoonkymonkey (talk) 01:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hello! Please remember to be civil on wikipedia. Also I think you have enough start on the page for you to expand. If you need help, please ask. Compwhiz II(Contribs) 01:51, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
If you right-click on a page in Firefox the 'View Page Info' option will tell you a fair amount about it, including the 'Modified' date. I think Internet Explorer lets you do a similar think by going to the 'File' menu, then 'Properties'. John Nevard (talk) 22:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Time for me to move up to Firefox.Spoonkymonkey (talk) 01:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Picture removal
Hello, I was just wondering why you removed the photograph of Mike Duffy from his article? It's the only available photograph we have of him, and I don't see any reason for it's removal (short of a request by Mr. Duffy himself, if he provides a freely licensed alternative for us to use). Just curious as to whether there was a specific reason or not :) -- Editor at Large • talk 03:25, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Second Life
I'm sorry to have declined (and removed) the speedy deletion tag you put on this article. I believe that the huge number of subscribers asserts notability; the 150 well-sourced references demonstrate that the topic is notable in a verifiable way, and its being "interesting" is not a criterion for speedy deletion. If you truly believe that this article ought to be deleted, I would suggest you take it to Articles for deletion -- although I believe it would pass AfD. If you have any questions about Misplaced Pages policy, feel free to leave me a note. Accounting4Taste:talk 18:56, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Sicko
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Sicko. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. (Diff) Nightscream (talk) 01:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- The Fraser Institute makes no bones about its conservatism or its opposition to Canada's medicare system. Spoonkymonkey (talk) 02:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- Does it explicitly bill itself as "right-wing" or "anti-medicare"? If so, can you provide a link? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- That link doesn't answer my question. I'm asking you if the Institute specifically bills itself as "right-wing" or "anti-medicare"? That page says that it "came to be known as a right-wing think tank", but not that this is a label it has chosen for itself, and it doesn't mention the word "medicare" at all. Does the Institute describe itself thus? Thanks again. Nightscream (talk) 02:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Don't worry about the crankiness. It happens. (Just make sure it doesn't become a habit.) As for the Institute, the issue is not whether they're "right-wing" or "anti-medicare". The issue is whether this wording constitutes an opinion, and whether it's relevant to that particular passage. Of course it's not meant as an insult. But putting aside the fact that the people on the other side of the political aisle can take it as such, the notion that they are "right-wing" or "anti-Medicare" is an opinion, and opinions are only permitted on WP if they're not only relevant, but attributed to cited sources. It is better to describe them using neutral language, and even then, only if it's relevant to the passage, and this is regardless of whether the person reminding you of this contributes "substantially" to the project. Even if someone whose work is mostly fact-tagging points this out, the issue is whether their point has merit. Thanks for responding. :-) Nightscream (talk) 22:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Mike Duffy
{{help}} We have some serious BLP violations happening here: Mike Duffy and an edit war is shaping up. Request page protect until Duffy's Senate appointment is out of the news cycle. (talk) 00:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Full protect asked for. In the meantime, try to set up a discussion on the talk page. NuclearWarfare My work 00:39, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello re: Al Stewart re: Richard Grenville
Regarding Al Stewart, what mutiny are you refering to ? in regards to Lord Grenville. I undid your good faith effort then further specified Richard Grenville as the song specifies Spanish Main and sailor motifs. I hope that if you have a specific reference, you will share it with me. Peace, rkmlai (talk) 00:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Lake Superior and Category:Volcanic areas of Canada
I have readded this category on the Lake Superior article because there IS volcanics at Lake Superior from volcanism of the Midcontinent Rift System. And it dosen't matter if there has not been active volcanism in the area for millions of years. What matters is the volcanics. I don't know if you are American or Canadian, but I suggest you learn more about the areas geology. Black Tusk (talk) 06:05, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
All areas are originally vulcanic. The Lake Superior area has not been active since the Jurassic, at the very latest.Spoonkymonkey (talk) 00:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- I have replied on my talk page. Black Tusk (talk) 18:22, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Please don't leave
Hi.
I see on your userpage you said, "Spoonkymoney has left Misplaced Pages due to its leftist bias and its cabal system. Find another sucker, Jimbo."
I can relate to your reason - very, very much. I added true, well sourced info that was critical of Barack Obama to wikipedia, and it kept getting deleted. I know how you feel. Now, I am no longer allowed to edit any articles about Obama. I do think there is a liberal bias at wikipedia. However, the majority consensus was to not include the info that I added. I don't like that, but that's how it works around here.
That being said, there are other editors here who can relate to your frustration besides me. And there are plenty of other articles that you could contribute to that don't get censored.
Grundle2600 (talk) 03:14, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
I've still been using Misplaced Pages once in a while, but now I overcome my urges and leave the typos, clunky writing and POV alone. The people who spend their time politicking on Misplaced Pages can use some of their energy to actually improving it. I'm done. The Misplaced Pages elite like Tony Sidaway simply play the rest of us as fools. Spoonkymonkey (talk) 21:21, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Please check here and see if you approve what I've done. MalcolmMcDonald (talk) 19:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Spoonkymonkey! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 7 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Hugh Halliday - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)