Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jfdwolff

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jfdwolff (talk | contribs) at 17:40, 4 May 2010 (→link removed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:40, 4 May 2010 by Jfdwolff (talk | contribs) (→link removed)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

  • New messages at the bottom, please.
  • If you leave messages here, please expect a response from me over here.
  • If I've left a message on your talkpage, and I'm slow to respond to a reply made there, please let me know.

Template:Archive box collapsible

Message

Hello, Jfdwolff. You have new messages at Immunize's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mediation Case

A request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Genesis Creation Myth has been filed with the Mediation Committee (MedCom). You have been named as a party in this request. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Genesis Creation Myth and then indicate in the "Party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate in the mediation or not.

Mediation is a process where a group of editors in disagreement over matters of article content are guided through discussing the issues of the dispute (and towards developing a resolution) by an uninvolved editor experienced with handling disputes (the mediator). The process is voluntary and is designed for parties who disagree in good faith and who share a common desire to resolve their differences. Further information on the MedCom is at Misplaced Pages:Mediation Committee; the policy the Committee will work by whilst handling your dispute is at Misplaced Pages:Mediation Committee/Policy; further information on Misplaced Pages's policy on resolving disagreements is at Misplaced Pages:Resolving disputes.

If you would be willing to participate in the mediation of this dispute but wish for its scope to be adjusted then you may propose on the case talk page amendments or additions to the list of issues to be mediated. Any queries or concerns that you have may be directed to an active mediator of the Committee or by e-mailing the MedCom's private mailing list (click here for details).

Please indicate on the case page your agreement to participate in the mediation within seven days of the request's submission.

Thank you, Weaponbb7 (talk)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 26 April 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Can you please take another look at what I did there and tell me if there is anything I can improve, thank you :-) MaenK.A.Talk 17:46, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Esophageal cancer

I have reverted your edit in which you removed the possible association of molybdenum to the cancer. While it is understandable that the research might not be complete, this can be said for almost any kind of research specially about cancers. As new information comes in many old established research goes out. So I do not consider your removal constructive since Misplaced Pages is an informative source on subjects not an authoritative clinical source. It is an encyclopedia which contains an index of human knowledge which warrants to mention molybdenum association even if right now the evidence is not strong enough to be included as a treatment in text book of medicine. The whole point is that wikipedia is not a text book of medicine. Also I have to remind you that it is hoped on my part that you did not remove the research for the reason that it was done by non-white people.--119.153.9.120 (talk) 18:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Your views on Misplaced Pages are generally correct, but we have to keep standards that distinguish between widely accepted ("encyclopedic") views and incompletely researched and poorly understood associations. Hence we have WP:MEDRS, which states very clearly what is required of a source to be worthy of inclusion. And no, journal articles don't mention the ethnicity of their authors and hence I did not make any edit on the basis of ethnicity. JFW | T@lk 20:41, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Spamlink

Hey Doc, allow me to point you to a note on my talk page. I think the links are spammy and you have reverted their addition also--and you are a different kind of doctor, better equipped to judge. Thanks, en groeten uit Alabama, Drmies (talk) 14:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Tags

I do what I can. If more needs doing then a tag acts as a reminder for myself and others. What's wrong with that? --Kwekubo (talk) 21:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Tags are tiresome, content is good. JFW | T@lk 22:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

FYI

I replied on my talk page. ---kilbad (talk) 00:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

link removed

Why did you remove this link? What was wrong with it? http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Jewish_services&action=history —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.178.34.130 (talk) 11:52, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Because it was spam. Please see WP:ELNO. JFW | T@lk 17:40, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 3 May 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:56, 4 May 2010 (UTC)