This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pboyd04 (talk | contribs) at 03:23, 21 January 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:23, 21 January 2006 by Pboyd04 (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Eszter Hargittai
Improperly (in my opinion this is apparently disputed) speedied under CSD:A7 now listed for due process ALKIVAR™
01:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep recipient of the Woodrow Wilson Scholarship, Notable internet sociologist interviewed by the BBC and CNNfn. Quoted by the Wall Street Journal, Chicago Tribune, Washington Post, BBC News, and Wired Magazine. Mentioned in US Senate during hearings on the PROTECT Act of 2003. Considered one of the prominent experts on "the Internet and its social effects" which I believe (have to check) was the subject of her dissertation for her Princeton Ph.D in Sociology. Currently a professor at Northwestern University and Faculty Fellow of the Institute for Policy Research at that university. ALKIVAR™
01:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete being interviewed or quoted doesn't make one notable, getting a scholarship doesn't make one notable. Being an adjunct professor is not notable. This person is on a tenure-track, and when she gets there maybe that will be notable. Ruby 02:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - I'd disagree: being interviewed or quoted DOES make one notable. You seem to be suggesting, Ruby, that for academics the ONLY measure of notability is tenure. I'd disagree; it's only one measure. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 03:14, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete one interview does not make you notable. --Pboyd04 03:23, 21 January 2006 (UTC)