Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ncmvocalist (talk | contribs) at 15:25, 1 August 2010 (→Notification: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to Jehochman's Talk Page Please feel free to put your feet on the coffee table, and speak candidly. Or for more better relaxation, stretch yourself luxuriously on the chaise longue in Bishzilla's Victorian parlour and mumble incoherently.

User talk:Jehochman/Archive index

Requesr

Jehochman, we do not see eye to eye in your admin actions. You have previously blocked me for what I consider bullshit, all that aside I have a request. Please review my "uncivilness" to a user and comment on their "evidence" I attacked them. I am confident this is no where near disruptive, harassmment or offensive. Please block away if you consider these edits over the line. ] Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:18, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

The page you linked to should be deleted tomorrow. Evidence for ANI should be posted quickly, or assembled offline if more time is needed. Jehochman 05:49, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

SEO definition

The SEO definition seem to be incorrect. Please correct it http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Search_engine_optimization&action=historysubmit&diff=372730503&oldid=372730185

I was not finiding a appropriate reference so I used my personal one. There is one here as well http://www.foundagency.com/understanding-sem/glossary.htm Ganesh J. Acharya (talk) 11:46, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Search Engine Optimization as its name says is only about Optimizing ones website. Claiming it gets traffic to a website is irrelevant. Ganesh J. Acharya (talk) 11:47, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

I got your input on my talk page, the problem is, I am not finding an appropriate reference which the appropriate definition. Ganesh J. Acharya (talk) 11:49, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

SEO methodically only alows search engine bots to extract relevant information for further analysis. Ganesh J. Acharya (talk) 11:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

"Not finding an appropriate reference" is a big issue when you make a disputed edit to a featured article. The wordsmithing that went into that article represents many hundreds of hours of time. We were quite precise with every word chosen, and the definitions closely follow what the reliable sources say. Feel free to propose new wording, but link drops to non-notable blogs and company websites are not appropriate. Jehochman 11:55, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

I understand the issues involving here, I have initiated an discussion on the talk page of the article. Ganesh J. Acharya (talk) 12:01, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

I have found an appropriate reference and have changed the wordings again.Ganesh J. Acharya (talk) 12:18, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

3O Request

You requested a 3rd opinion, but I am unable to find where any discussion of the issue between the disagreeing editors has occurred. IMO, edit comments do not really count. BigK HeX (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Clinton Cimring

Hi , can you tell me what is wrong with is article , I but many references in it to support what is writin , I write it because I found a request in Misplaced Pages:Requested articles/Business and economics/People in business Mohamed Ouda (talk) 20:01, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to attempt to write the article. I am sorry you were caught in the middle of what has been a longstanding problem. With the search engine optimization articles there is a tendency for people to try to use Misplaced Pages for self promotion, which of course was not your intention. I will take a look and see who filed that request. Best regards, Jehochman 02:54, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Miscellaneous mootch

To: User talk:AliceJMarkham, User talk:Bearcat, User talk:Fuhghettaboutit, User:Jehochman, User talk:Jokestress, and User talk:Pmanderson

Hi folks,

While I know that Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages is not a social networking site, I've read edits from each of you and figure that you might have something to contribute to my RD question Being private verses public?. If you can help, I'd greatly appreciate it, though even your attention here is appreciated as well. Thanks.205.189.194.208 (talk) 22:39, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

ANI discussion tangentially involving you

Please see this discussion at ANI about User:Neutralhomer violating unblock conditions that you set for him. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:34, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Per this. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 23:24, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Notification

Please see Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Proposed_amendment, and the subthreads above it. You are being notified as you were one of the users who proposed or discussed the original sanction. Ncmvocalist (talk) 15:25, 1 August 2010 (UTC)