Misplaced Pages

User talk:Justa Punk

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MuZemike (talk | contribs) at 06:34, 8 November 2010 (Protected User talk:Justa Punk: Excessive sock puppetry ( (indefinite) (indefinite))). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 06:34, 8 November 2010 by MuZemike (talk | contribs) (Protected User talk:Justa Punk: Excessive sock puppetry ( (indefinite) (indefinite)))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User:Justa Punk, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. GiftigerWunsch 22:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Blocked

I have blocked your account indefinitely, as it seems clear that you have no intention of constructively helping to build an encyclopedia. You may appeal this block by placing the template {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Hersfold 23:16, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justa Punk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have the right to protect my user space under WP:UP. There is no rule that says I can't redirect my talk page to my user page. I have already removed any personal attack from the template on my user page and I expect to be able to defend myself from return attacks until such time as they are sorted. This is not disruptive editing as I have not done any article editing and don't intend to. This account will be retired once people leave my user space alone. Oh, and calling the SITE Xenophobic is an attack on the content. Basically what I have done is; # Solidified the SPA result that got my previous block (I'm not going to argue over User:Mal Case because he's decided not to fight it because he was being penalised for using my computer) and took out NO sock templates on the user pages of identified socks. I call that a positive contribution that had no reason for reversion. # Another reason for the block was a "blatant NPA violation". I took that on board and fixed it, directing it to content. I am entitled to my opinion aren't I?

Decline reason:

Seeing as how you're leaving Misplaced Pages, your need to use your userpages is at an end. Misplaced Pages has user and user talk pages for the advancement of the project, not for soapboxing or to help you insult the project as you make your exit.--Chaser (talk) 00:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you please try to address the actual reasons for the block, in your unblock request? Ie demonstrate why unblocking this account would help improve Misplaced Pages? Otherwise, to appeal, you could send an email. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  23:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
I thought I did. Are you saying I'm not allowed to protect my user space just because I'm leaving once that's sorted? (moved rest to unblock request)
Let's discuss this instead of jumping to conclusions. !! Justa Punk !! 23:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Being as he doesn't intend to do any editing, I don't see any point in unblocking. This is what we call a self-solving problem: he's 'quitting', so why does he need an unblock? If anything, this should prevent the creation of 'like-thinking individuals' if you catch my drift. HalfShadow 23:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
I've explained why the unblock should occur. !! Justa Punk !! 23:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Oh and that comment was rude. !! Justa Punk !! 23:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC)