This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Captain Occam (talk | contribs) at 12:22, 23 November 2010 (→You're being discussed at AE…: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:22, 23 November 2010 by Captain Occam (talk | contribs) (→You're being discussed at AE…: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
You're being discussed at AE…
here.
Don’t worry, nobody’s accusing you of having done anything wrong. This thread is mostly just more accusations of wrongdoing from Mathsci against the editors that he disagrees with, this time being directed at me as well as two fairly new editors. But one of the new people has apparently read several of the arbitration pages, and is taking some of the advice that you offered about Mathsci there to heart.
I’ve also referred there to the circumstances under which you first got involved in the race and intelligence article, based on what I can remember about it. I don’t think I’ve misremembered this—I looked at your contributions from 2009 to make sure—but you can correct me if I have. --Captain Occam (talk) 12:22, 23 November 2010 (UTC)