This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JohnCD (talk | contribs) at 14:33, 26 December 2010 (notability). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:33, 26 December 2010 by JohnCD (talk | contribs) (notability)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Delta Ray
Epsilon Radiation
Delta Bond
Topic: Sexual Censorship
"Now some people oppose, and I ask you why. Things should never be kept from people, even in this area in particular. Sexual content should not be blocked for a main reason that a model of free speech and such plays into effect. I personally feel like it should not be blocked because people for a main reason that a person deprived of knowledge, is a person without any knowledge of the true world. People should not be judged for wanting to know these things, it's just the perfectly normal human sense of curiosity."
The policy creates stricter guidelines for sexual content, particularly making things that are deemed "out of scope" subject to speedy deletions. If you're for more sexual content with less censorship then I think you meant to vote oppose? --AerobicFox (talk) 20:36, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Not exactly, seeing such as the right to such free speech should rather dictate whether you should or shouldn't allow stricter rights on said topic.
Speedy deletion nomination of Stumpy308.net
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Stumpy308.net requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Chzz ► 07:39, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- The reason why I have deleted this page is that it gave no indication that the website was notable enough to have an article. Notability is a Misplaced Pages term which is not a matter of opinion but must be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." For more detail see WP:Your first article and WP:Notability (web). JohnCD (talk) 14:33, 26 December 2010 (UTC)