Misplaced Pages

Talk:Texas A&M University/to do

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Texas A&M University

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EdisonLBM (talk | contribs) at 06:16, 26 February 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 06:16, 26 February 2006 by EdisonLBM (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
  • History - expand (it's more about the Morrill Act than TAMU itself). An old picture that we could get the rights to would be nice.
  • Academics - expand as needed (though I don't know how much that is). Turn lists into paragraphs.
  • Athletics - spin off into different article (either Texas Aggie, taking relevant info from that article and moving it into Traditions of Texas A&M University, or Texas Aggie Athletics - opinions on which is better?)
  • Notable Buildings - should be, I think, removed. Descriptions of why the buildings are notable (for instance, the cloning comments) might belong elsewhere. Buildings notable enough to be really encyclopedic get their own article, anything else can be covered by a passing mention in the article.
  • Student Life - expand; mainly, looking at different aspects (as opposed to mentioning that they exist with a sentence).
  • Endowment - total rewrite. Cover complete endowment, not just the PUF (which the article currently states is <10% anyways). Perhaps include with another topic - University of Michigan has this combined with research. That could work well.
  • Notes/Sources - I don't know how they got this way, but the format is all wrong. Probably a thing to do last, as a decent shakeup could be expected if even some of the above is attempted.