Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Adam4267 (talk | contribs) at 18:13, 7 August 2011 (→August 2011: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Notability

Bobby Barr is a notable player please do not add tags of that nature. The Scottish First Division is listed as fully pro even if it wasn't its a notable League and players in it would Pass GNG. The division will stay on the list untill further consensus is reached which is no where near happening as you already have seen at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues.Warburton1368 (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

SFL1 is a third-rate competition with semi-pro players. Please provide evidence of enduring significant coverage in reliable sources, for this particular no-mark, before removing the notability tag. Thanks 94.2.38.154 (talk) 17:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

It isn't the case at all. if you wish to discuss go to ]. Warburton1368 (talk) 17:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

You have no consensus therefore the onus is actually on you to prove otherwise not me. I take part in discussions The consensus is on the side of the league. I will once again advise you to go to the talk page Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues. You do not seem interested to do that just add tags to articles and delete from fully pro without consensus that isn't discussing if anything thats being disruptive. I will not get in to an edit war with you. Also you reply on my talk page not someone else's Warburton1368 (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Please read WP:BURDEN. If you wish to pretend that SFL1 is "fully professional" then please find some sources. Asking co-contributors to follow policy is not disruptive AFAIK. 94.2.38.154 (talk) 17:39, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

I an going to report this as you seem to be unable to be constructive you know the discussion page is there but you are intent on Not following discussion on consensus if that isnt disruptive. The burden is on you as you are the one trying to change the consensus at wpfooty not me. Warburton1368 (talk) 17:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Do not repeat the edit you made at Ayr United. You may have a certain opinion but the way forward is through discussion, not by making changes which are not constructive or following the consensus on football articles. Please assume good faith and do not make disruptive edits to try and advance your point, or you may be blocked. Adam4267 (talk) 18:13, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. (WHOIS  Geolocate  Proxy Checker Current blocks XTools Global contributions) (RIRs: Africa America Asia-Pacific Europe Latin America/Caribbean)