This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Arcticocean (talk | contribs) at 21:39, 10 September 2011 (→Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: Gr - declined). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:39, 10 September 2011 by Arcticocean (talk | contribs) (→Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: Gr - declined)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Stubes99
Stubes99 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Stubes99/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Stubes99.
– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
08 September 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Koertefa (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Per Request made in wrong name.
Koertefa knows a rules of Misplaced Pages too good for a newcomer. After the user Stubes99 was banned he started to edit Black army of Hungary http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Black_Army_of_Hungary&action=history . He is in the similar edit warring with me and user Yoppie as the Stubes99 was. They a both works at the similary pages, usualy about Slovak and Hungarian history. They has a similary edit summaries and offensive style of communication. Samofi (talk) 11:31, 8 September 2011 (UTC) -- DQ (t) (e) 12:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I'm not sure I see enough connection here. Stubes99 has been checked several times since this account was created and Koertefa's name hasn't come up. Do you have any other evidence that shows a connection here? TNXMan 14:23, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed - Eh... it's possible. There's some overlap in area of expertise. Having said that, this could also be Shenhertz (CU - you can use Indexatecasă (talk · contribs) to look), so I'm endorsing to find out if it's either. — HelloAnnyong 03:53, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Declined. No, Koertefa is not a new account, and I am unprepared to check accounts which are not obvious "throwaways" without a better reason than an overlap in the general area of contribution. AGK 21:39, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Categories: