This is an old revision of this page, as edited by John plaut (talk | contribs) at 22:24, 16 October 2011 (←Created page with '{{TOC right}} == Balanced hands == A balanced hand might be considered the one who lacks a void or a singleton, having no more than five cards in a specific sui...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:24, 16 October 2011 by John plaut (talk | contribs) (←Created page with '{{TOC right}} == Balanced hands == A balanced hand might be considered the one who lacks a void or a singleton, having no more than five cards in a specific sui...')(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Balanced hands
A balanced hand might be considered the one who lacks a void or a singleton, having no more than five cards in a specific suit. It also was common to consider out of this range those five-four hands, but modern conventions might deal with a 5-4-2-2 hand increasing the frequency of the 4-3-3-3, 4-4-3-2 and 5-3-3-2 strain from 47.5% to 58.1%. It is common practice, whatever the type of contract bridge played, to assign points to the 4 higher honors in each suit in order to evaluate one's hand. This points are called High Card Points (HCP) and are an aproximation of the real value, and they are:
Ace = 4 HCP King = 3 HCP Queen = 2 HCP Jack = 1 HCP
This evaluation method was devised by Bryant McCampbell in 1915 and was published by Milton Work in 1923, today known as the "Work Point Count" or "Milton Work Point Count.
Four Aces
In the early thirties Howard Schenken, author of the Schenken system formed a succesfull team called the "Four Aces", together with Oswald Jacoby, Richard Frey and David Bruce. They devised an evaluation method of 3-2-1-0.5, totalling 26 HCP. <ref name="Point count /ref>
One over one
George Reith devised another count method between 1930 and 1933, in which the 10 was asigned 1 point. To maintain proportionallity the points asigned were 6-4-3-2-1, making a total of 64.
Vienna
The Vienna System was popular among austrian players before the II World War. In 1935 Dr. Paul Stern devised the Vienna system using the Bamberger scale, which run 7-5-3-1 with no value much less e asignated to the 10.
In fact, if we consider that a deck has 13 tricks, and that Aces and Kings win most of the tricks, the evaluation of 4 for an Ace is somehow an underevaluation. Real Ace value is around 4,25, A King is around 3, a queen less than 2. But the simplictiy of the 4-3-2-1 count is evident, and the solution to better evaluate is to rectify the total value of the hand after adding the MK points.
Adjustments to MK count
Honors adjustments
- concentration of honors in a suit increases the value of the hand
- honors in the long suits increases the value of the hand. On the other hand, honors in the short suits decreases the value of the hand.
- Intermediate honors suported increase the value of the hand, say KQJ98 is far more valuable than KQ432
- Unsupported honors do count less as they have much less chance to win a trick or to promote tricks. The adjustment made is as follows:
- count 2 HCP instead of 3 for a singleton K
- count 1 HCP instead of 2 for a singleton Q
- count 0 HCP instead of 1 for a singleton J or even Jx
- decrease 1 point the value of unsupported honor combinations: AJ, KQ, KJ, QJ
Distributional adjustments
- deduct 1 HCP for a 4333 ditribution
- add 1 HCP for having AAAA, i.e., first control in all suits.
- add 1 point for a good five-card suit
Unbalanced hands
The balanced HCP count loses weight s the distribution becomes more and more unbalanced.
Unbalanced hands are divided in 3 groups: one-suited, two-suited and three-suited hands. three-suited hands are evalauted counting HCP and distributional points,DP. The distributional points show the potential of the hand to take low-card tricks including long-suit tricks or short-suit tricks (ruffing tricks). Opener's DP count are less valuable as responders because trumping in the long side does not add tricks to the total number of tricks
References
- ^ Bridge classic and modern conventions, vol I, Niku Kantar & Dan Dimitrescu, Magnus Lundqvist, 2001, ISBN 91-631-1099-7