This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ZjarriRrethues (talk | contribs) at 19:42, 21 March 2012 (→Deletion of the cited additions of others). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:42, 21 March 2012 by ZjarriRrethues (talk | contribs) (→Deletion of the cited additions of others)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Albania Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Deletion of the cited additions of others
@ZjarriRrethues: You removed cited information about the ethnicity of members of Spani family.
Sources:
- Šufflay, Milan (1925), Srbi i Arbanasi : (njihova simbioza u srednjem vijeku) (in Serbian), Belgrade, OCLC 440847167, retrieved 20 January 2012,
Obitelj ova Span, de Span, Hi* spanus, Spanović podrijetlom je grčka"
{{citation}}
: More than one of|author=
and|last=
specified (help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Glas, Volume 338 (in Serbian). Serbian Academy of Science and Arts. 1983. p. 72. Retrieved 20 January 2012.
Петар Спан, господар краја између Скадра и Дриваста, чији су се преци, пореклом Грци,
- Schmitt, Oliver Jens (2001), Das venezianische Albanien (1392-1479), München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag GmbH München, p. 128, ISBN 3-486-56569--9,
Stefano Span (griechischer Herkunft; im 15 Jahrhundert Drivastiner patrizier)
{{citation}}
: More than one of|author=
and|last=
specified (help)
You explained your removal by writing in edit line: please don't make POV/OR deductions, I've already added that below. I am afraid that what you wrote is not true. The only removed information you added to the body of the article was the information about the meaning of the family name (beardles), but you did not add below the removed information about the ethnicity of Spani. Was this a mistake? In case this was not a mistake please explain your point. Let me remind you that what you did can be seen as a form of tendentious editing: removal of statements that are pertinent, sourced reliably, and written in a neutral style constitutes disruption and you are already warned not to engage in further: "ethno-nationalist tendentious editing--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- The issue, which you analyzed in one word has been dealt with and explained by the use of modern sources in a complete section and without deductions that make little common sense. Btw misquoting and misattributing 1+ year old discussions is something that you have done before and you were warned by an admin about it when I was reviewing Gaius's GAN. --— ZjarriRrethues — 19:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)