This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk | contribs) at 10:05, 2 April 2012 (→Clarification: Perhaps you can contact Math Reviews and ask them to remove the "confusing" entry about John Rainwater?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:05, 2 April 2012 by Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk | contribs) (→Clarification: Perhaps you can contact Math Reviews and ask them to remove the "confusing" entry about John Rainwater?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A fact from John Rainwater appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 April 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
John Rainwater is immortal
Rumors of Rainwater's demise are unfounded:
Where does John Rainwater go from here? It would be a shame if he were to die. It is to be hoped that someone will be able to help John Rainwater carry on, so that in the future people won't ask "Who killed J.R.?"
Quoting from Phelps (2002) ( Kiefer.Wolfowitz (Discussion) 17:33, 2 April 2011 (UTC)). 17:03, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Coda
This very serious comment responds to the change in assessment status from "living=yes" to "living=no"! Kiefer.Wolfowitz (Discussion) 14:35, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- We don't really have a code to indicate a pseudonym of living or non-living people. Perhaps a note to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Biography would help. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:32, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Done! Kiefer.Wolfowitz (Discussion) 15:54, 3 April 2011 (UTC) 17:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Clarification
Currently the text is a bit confusing and it's hard to figure out whether he was fictional or not. The infobox and categories present him as a real prototype, yet the text suggests he is fictitious. Brandmeister 21:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- You're right. I have trimmed the infobox, removing birth date and nationality and residence, for that reason. I think the whole infobox should go, actually, unless it can be altered to show immediately that Rainwater is fictitious. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 00:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- You can learn by recognizing confusion, if you want to know the truth and can be honest about being confused.
- Removing an information box is less drastic than an auto-lobotomy, but does suffice to remove the irritation about confusion.
- Perhaps you can contact Math Reviews and ask them to remove the "confusing" entry about John Rainwater?
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 10:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class mathematics articles
- Low-priority mathematics articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- Start-Class Washington articles
- Unknown-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- Start-Class Seattle articles
- Low-importance Seattle articles
- WikiProject Seattle articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Misplaced Pages Did you know articles