This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Second Quantization (talk | contribs) at 16:59, 14 June 2012 (→Fringe Template: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:59, 14 June 2012 by Second Quantization (talk | contribs) (→Fringe Template: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Unreliable sources
Steinerbooks is not a reliable source for the claims that it is is informed by developments in quantum physics, postmodern philosophy and Jungian psychology etc, the views of Sean Kelly, have no due weight. IRWolfie- (talk) 16:15, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
The views of Louise Danielle Palmer of Spirituality & Health magazine don't have due weight for stating how compelling a case she thinks is made by Tarnas. IRWolfie- (talk) 16:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Fringe Template
The article currently is unbalanced, it currently makes Astrology appear to look more WP:VALID than it is due. @Goethean, please do not remove this template without discussion (particularly considering you are the article creator). IRWolfie- (talk) 16:59, 14 June 2012 (UTC)