This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot I (talk | contribs) at 13:53, 5 April 2012 (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 31d) to Talk:Nazareth/Archive 3, Talk:Nazareth/Archive 2.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:53, 5 April 2012 by MiszaBot I (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 31d) to Talk:Nazareth/Archive 3, Talk:Nazareth/Archive 2.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nazareth article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article and its editors are subject to Misplaced Pages general sanctions. See discretionary sanctions for details |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nazareth article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Israel may be able to help! |
Nazareth Village
The article links to http://www.uhl.ac/nazareth.htm, describing a visitor center called "Nazareth Village". The official webpage for Nazareth Village is "www.nazarethvillage.com".
The Nazareth Flag
Can anyone add the Nazareth Flag ?
Strange POV in section on New Testament
The section titled "New Testament References" seems both incorrect and misleading. The details of how this text is wrong lead me to believe that the information presented is deliberately misleading.
Overall, the intent of the three paragraphs leads the reader to the following mistaken conclusions: (1) Translations from Greek to English are mistranslating "Ναζωραιοσ" as "of Nazareth" rather than "Nazarene." Greek words are inflected according to the part of speech in which they are being used. "Ναζωραιοσ" is an adjective form of the root "Ναζαρεθ" (2) Although Jesus may have lived in Nazareth, that would somehow not make him a Nazarene. The article therefore is refuting content from the New Testament, to wit Matthew 2:23: "And coming he-down-homes into city being-said "Nazareth" (Ναζαρεθ) which-how may-be-being-filled the being-declared through the (prophets) that "Nazarene" (Ναζωραιοσ) he-shall-be-being-called."
The section seems to appeal to obscure information from the original Greek before translation to English, but the assertions made about the Greek are false. Those who wrote this section may be attempting to deliberately mislead viewers.
My thought it to replace the entire section with a brief reference to Matthew 2:23, which explains the significance of the city to NT readers, without addressing the made-up controversy.
I notice the existing section has 3 references. The first is to a series of NT citations organized according to Original Research. The second is to an 1899 source. I submit these are not representative of broad modern thought on the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heathhunnicutt (talk • contribs) 15:30, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
This edit deleted a bunch of material which should have been cited to Dumper. I've restored it and added the citation, the lack of which, I m assuming was the reason for its deletion. If I am wrong, please clarify hat the problem is. Tiamut 18:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
transliteration of צ
I changed it from "ts" to "ṣ" as it makes no sense when talking about classical Hebrew to transliterate it with Modern Israeli pronunciations..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.67.156.46 (talk) 12:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages articles under general sanctions
- All unassessed articles
- Unassessed WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- B-Class Israel-related articles
- Mid-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- B-Class Palestine-related articles
- Mid-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- Misplaced Pages requested maps in Israel