Misplaced Pages

User talk:Eric mit 1992

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yobol (talk | contribs) at 00:29, 30 July 2012 (Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:29, 30 July 2012 by Yobol (talk | contribs) (Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Blacklight Power

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. I see that you've taken an interest in one of our fringe science articles. Please be aware that these can be rather more controversial and difficult to work on than are the bulk of articles in the encyclopedia. One key to avoiding such problems is to rely on the most Reliable sources, while being very cautious in how we use primary sources. While this article can use statements published by BLPI, it should do so in the correct voice, so that it is clear to the reader as to whether the encyclopedia is asserting something as independently verified fact, or merely relating BLPI's assertion. Before stating something extrodinary as a fact in the voice of the encyclopedia we need multiple independent excellent sources. Cheers, LeadSongDog come howl! 18:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Books feedback

I saw your frustrated edits at Help:Books/Feedback! I'm sorry I'm not able to help you with the books tool, as I've never used it myself. But you might like to consider creating and editing books without using the tool - just go to the book's page and click "Edit" at the top as usual. Have a look at a few using this link - Special:Random/Book - and you'll see that the format is quite simple. -- John of Reading (talk) 05:45, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Edits

I removed a section, you restored it without dealing with my comments. Don't re-insert it again, discuss things on the talk page so consensus can be reached. IRWolfie- (talk) 23:44, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

On the contrary, you shall not delete the original text that I added before your edits. Eric mit 1992 (talk) 00:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Fringe theories

Not that the article you appear to be focussed on editing falls under some relevant policies and guidelines, here are the important bits: WP:PSCI: "hile pseudoscience may in some cases be significant to an article, it should not obfuscate the description of the mainstream views of the scientific community. Any inclusion of pseudoscientific views should not give them undue weight. The pseudoscientific view should be clearly described as such. An explanation of how scientists have received pseudoscientific theories should be prominently included.", and also read WP:FRINGE. IRWolfie- (talk) 00:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Yobol (talk) 00:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC)