This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Headhitter (talk | contribs) at 07:44, 23 September 2012 (→Our Lady of Loreto and St Winefride's, Kew: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:44, 23 September 2012 by Headhitter (talk | contribs) (→Our Lady of Loreto and St Winefride's, Kew: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Barnstar of (ploop) --oh NO it fell in the water!
Barnstar of (ploop) --oh NO it fell in the water! | |
your 'harass/stalk' gives many needed smiles. i therefore as maker of this lighthearted barnstar award one to you. cheers. Cramyourspam (talk) 16:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC) |
- I personally prefer the 'talk/stalk' variation, mostly because it rhymes. I think I understand why 'harass' is used instead of 'talk' in this case :-) ~Adjwilley (talk) 20:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- I've been considering “cry/spy” as a variation. —Kerfuffler harass
stalk 20:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- I've been considering “cry/spy” as a variation. —Kerfuffler harass
Stan Harper
Stan Harper is certainly notable. The article should be a speedy keep. Notability in fine arts across a wide spectrum is often tricky. This is particularly true for countless jazz musicians who flourished in the 1930s thru the 1950s. Notability for jazzers, recording engineers, independent record labels, and classical musicians is not a Google-able sort of thing. Given that this is a harmonica player, and given that he is prominently chronicled in major Who's Who reference books and newspapers, not to mention discography, I would urge you to loosen-up. I am a humble editor who stumbled on the harmonica world by first tripping over a record label founded by Charlie Leighton. Eight references (6 while have a global audience) for a start-article on Stan Harper is not weak. And it fills a huge hole in the harmonica world. — Eurodog (talk) 01:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't propose it for deletion; I tagged it as needing improvement. The main problem is that the references the article uses are poor—many of them are to Who's Who, which is not considered a marker for notability (see WP:NOTWHOSWHO), and is not particularly reliable (see Who's Who for reasons why). If you could improve the references, that would be great! —Kerfuffler howl
prowl 02:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)- Okay, I'll tackle it. I added it to supplement another article, and — as is the case with many articles — found myself derailed in a new world. — Eurodog (talk) 02:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. BTW, have you seen Bruce Willis play harmonica with his band? —Kerfuffler howl
prowl 02:14, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. BTW, have you seen Bruce Willis play harmonica with his band? —Kerfuffler howl
- Okay, I'll tackle it. I added it to supplement another article, and — as is the case with many articles — found myself derailed in a new world. — Eurodog (talk) 02:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Zlatko Juričević
I noteced your insertion of tags to the article, however the article has no notability issues as he played professional football both in Yugoslavia and Turkey, thus passes sports notability. The major problem is that the website which has most often been used for Central/Eastern European footballers from this period (1970s til 1990s) has been temporarely on another adress, thus it has been erased from a lot of articles, however this situation is temporary and it is being followed at WP:FOOTY, however, even with the recomendation of not using the temporary adress, I inserted it for you anyway so you can confirmed that he played in top leagues of Yugoslavia and Turkey, and thus, as I said, passing WP:GNG for footballers. Please try to double-check football notability guidelines before tagging them in such manner, or I am allways available to clarify any concerns you might have. Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 05:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Our Lady of Loreto and St Winefride's, Kew
Thanks for the refimprove tag. I've now added some citations, so I hope the tag can now be removed.Headhitter (talk) 07:44, 23 September 2012 (UTC)