Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ping Fu

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Keihatsu (talk | contribs) at 19:13, 2 October 2012 (Some questions: some comments overall). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:13, 2 October 2012 by Keihatsu (talk | contribs) (Some questions: some comments overall)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconArticles for creation GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted on 17 September 2012 by reviewer Joel Kirk (talk · contribs).
WikiProject iconBiography GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconComputing Unassessed High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen's History GA‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Some questions

I came to this article to help address the neutrality concerns that another editor flagged. I don't see any description of the perceived POV issues here, and left a note on the page of the editor who added that tag asking whether they could explain their concerns. I did notice a different problem, though, which is that the references are not very complete. There are only a few inline citations, and of those, only one of them (the profile in Inc. Magazine) is independent of the subject. The others are from Ping Fu's autobiography and her company's website. However, there are lots of other sources listed as references at the bottom of the page. Maybe we could convert those into inline citations? Keihatsu (talk) 06:01, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

You are right and some of them probably were cites, since one lists a page number. Happy editing. --  :- ) Don 14:16, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
I'll take a look at converting those sources into in-line references. In the mean time, the editor who flagged the page as having neutrality problems has still not responded, so I think I am going to remove that tag, as I don't see any major issues myself. Another question I have is about the ranking of this page as a "Good Article." I've read a bit about the evaluation criteria, and I'm not sure this one makes the grade. Do you have any thoughts?Keihatsu (talk) 19:13, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Categories: