Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Arkon (talk | contribs) at 00:26, 13 November 2012 (archive). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Global encyclopaedia

My main concern is that both the Obama and Romney Talk pages are being very obviously flooded by opponents of the parties those two gentlemen belong to, who want to post the most minute, irrelevant, negative trivia in order to boost their favoured party's candidate for President. The vast majority of this stuff is already of no interest to observers outside the US, and will be forgotten after the election. There has to be more to the discussion of these two men than simply what interests politically active Americans right now.

Hi Arkon, FYI I removed vandalism in this section. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 19:01, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Much appreciated. Arkon (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

FAR review

I have made comments on the Barack Obama talk page about having a FAR. I have been neutral and recognized the fuckwit potential but also the greater need to have it. See my comments there. Evergreenme (talk) 21:13, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Anyone who may be watching this page

I got a confirmation e-mail to my tablet earlier today, for wikipedia. Needless to say, I had my account here waaaaaay before I had my tablet, and the corresponding e-mail address. I can't recall updating it. Any ideas? Arkon (talk) 03:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Romney

What is that article? Not encyclopedy! But: edit war, poll war or class war? -- Merlinschnee (talk) 04:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

I...yeah, I have no idea what you are saying. Arkon (talk) 04:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Unvanishing

I already knew it was going to take place due to private correspondences, but they needed to get ArbCom on board for some reason. I wasn't thrilled that ArbCom needed to be in the mix (and not sure why they did) but I was convinced that it was going to happen anyway. Since the result was the goal, this turned out to be the shortest, most simple and drama free way to achieve the goal, hence my request for patience. It's done now, which I agree is the proper thing under the circumstances. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 10:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

The beach called my name, and I've been away, so to start: I was less than sober on my last post on AN/I, just annoyed by the seeming drag-assness :) But everything ended up how it should be, so I really do appreciate your help. Arkon (talk) 02:51, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Not a problem For what it is worth, editing buzzed can get you in trouble around here, I've seen it before. I try to shut off the computer after the 2nd beer myself. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 12:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

I've lasted 7 years or so, clean on the blocks, but my nice nature gets fuzzed. :) Arkon (talk) 22:44, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 18:49, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Romney's relative wealth

Hi Arkon. Regarding your recent revert, please note that the article is now being reviewed by a Featured Article Candidate (FAC) reviewer. That editor indicated at the article talk page that the RFC was closed improperly, and I agree. Also, did you notice how brief the sentence in question is, and where I placed it? Sometimes the best way to make progress at an article is to compromise. Any chance you might reconsider your revert? Cheers.Anythingyouwant (talk) 23:11, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

If it was closed improperly, you should probably ask the closer to review it. However, just ignoring it, is also improper. Arkon (talk) 23:14, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sally Season

You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sally Season. Viriditas (talk) 07:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Template:Z48

Thanks, commented there. Arkon (talk) 16:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Romney on FEMA

Please join the conversation on the Political positions of Mitt Romney Talk page. Dezastru (talk) 22:56, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Beat ya to it :) Arkon (talk) 23:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)